- 1. [CQ-Contest] IDing, not (score: 1)
- Author: <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 21:49:21 -0500
- I was going to tell a couple people that I did not agree with them but maybe I do, but not in the same way. I think that this non-IDing rule may indeed make things worse and not better. Promoting not
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00090.html (7,804 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing, not (score: 1)
- Author: Monte Stark <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:03:51 -0800
- There is an easy cure..... Just require the call to be part of the exchange. OK, back in my hole, Ron, KU7Y Northern California Contest Club CWOps #1211 ku7y@qsl.net http:\\www.hatpinsandmore.com ___
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00091.html (6,556 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing, not (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:30:08 -0600
- Frankly, I don't care if you ID or not. It is your decision. When we set up 6D2X back in the 90s we consciously decided to ID after every contact. It didn't seem to create too bad a problem since we
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00092.html (9,889 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing, not (score: 1)
- Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:48:52 -0500
- CQing minutes, then your unless you If there's a line to work someone - as would be implied by him not ID'ing often - then there's no problem. He was not a candidate for the "new band rush" if there
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00095.html (8,253 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing, not (score: 1)
- Author: <w7dra@juno.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 09:44:54 -0800
- there seems to be some sort of weird philosophy among contesters and especially contest organizations that you can compare scores over the years the contest has been in existence. seems that usually
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00096.html (9,136 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu