Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IDing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+IDing\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] IDing (score: 1): Author: lu5cw@geocities.com (LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg); Date: Fri Jul 17 18:53:26 1998; Hello to all If you're worrying about the need to ID your station every end of TX, think about this. Here we are required to sign both calls EVERY over. Of course no one does... Also, if you are a gu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00160.html (6,845 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] IDing (score: 1): Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 12:49:11 -0800; Hi Steve, Dale, others who think it is discourteous not to ID after every QSO: You missed Bob's point entirely. The idea is to have callers in the pileup wait as short a time as possible to work you.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00050.html (7,498 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:27:28 -0700; You missed Bob's point entirely. The idea is to have callers in the pileup wait as short a time as possible to work you. You have ignored the time wasted by those who are listening, and silently wait; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00054.html (7,776 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing (score: 1): Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:50:21 -0800; Hi Steve, Implicit in your response is the recognition that there is a trade-off between wasting the time of those who know your call and are already in the pile-up, and those who are listening for y; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00058.html (8,104 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing (score: 1): Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 20:22:48 -0500; Not wanting to stir the POT . I understand the rare DX station fighting off the DIN and the ID tool to control the hordes But like the example you her the pile up or see it in your band scope do the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00060.html (9,205 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:50:00 -0700; Then lets address those that have an issue. This seems like veiled threats by those in charge. Instead of dealing directly with those who do not sign "properly" we instead decide to write up more rul; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00062.html (9,251 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 07:46:28 -0500 (EST); The cars racing at Nascar races are IDed by their numbers at all times though, aren't they? Not to have an identification number would be a black flag. K4XS In a message dated 2/4/2014 11:08:29 A.M.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00064.html (7,822 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 08:10:25 -0500; Personally I send my call after every QSO. But a busted cluster spot is obviously more correct than what you or I are sending. Even if I think a spot is correct I will still listen (but usually not f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00066.html (9,508 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] IDing (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:06:20 -0600; "Do you think Nascar would slow down a race because people can't really see who just whipped by on the track or the sponsors start complaining that their logos are impossible to see at 200mph........; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00067.html (10,323 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]