Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+INNOVATIVE\s+IDEA\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+INNOVATIVE\s+IDEA\?\?\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Fri Jul 31 22:07:07 1998; NO WONDER the guys on P4 and PJ9 win ! (THEY know that their USA contacts are worth 50% more than USA contacts from V2 ! .... 2 pts X 1.5 = 3 :-) de N4KG .................. On Fri, 31 Jul 1998 17:01:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00001.html (8,990 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: jneiger@xtised.com (James Neiger); Date: Thu Jul 30 14:17:34 1998; My "innovative idea" for the month of July is proposed as a potential solution to the 1 point - 2 points -3 points inequity inherent in the CQ WW DX Contest scoring that has bothered some/many over t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00264.html (9,453 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough); Date: Fri Jul 31 00:23:58 1998; I believe that eliminating the inequity inherent in the scoring for African stations is an excellent idea, however we should preserve the scoring advantage for South American stations. --Trey, HC8N -; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00273.html (8,112 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: K1EA@contesting.com (Ken Wolff); Date: Fri Jul 31 08:55:02 1998; This is the best suggestion I've seen in years, stimulating expeditions to all kinds of neat places. - Ken ** Ken Wolff K1EA K1EA@contesting.com ** My "innovative idea" for the month of July is propo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00274.html (10,565 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Fri Jul 31 08:41:09 1998; HERE, HERE ! Equalizing all out of country contacts should have been done DECADES ago, IMHO. It is sheer non-sense to introduce variable contact point value by continent (distance may be an interesti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00275.html (8,405 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: jayt@comtch.iea.com (Jay Townsend); Date: Fri Jul 31 09:28:30 1998; That's a great idea as long as we include the following: All U.S. States & Canadian Prov's are Countries These news countries will be mults as well. That oughta make the bands hum. -- CQ-Contest on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00279.html (8,449 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: sherrick@ameritech.net (Scot Herrick); Date: Fri Jul 31 11:46:49 1998; I personally like the innovative idea - but the contest sponsors would never go for it (especially since we have to preserve the HC8N advantage!!) - records, tradition, and all that. Rather than talk; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00280.html (8,648 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: miltj@aepnet.com (Milt Jensen); Date: Fri Jul 31 12:09:27 1998; Why wait. The logs are available for past contests. Just take a set of them and apply the proposed scoring routine. Surely someone out there has the time to do this exercise and report back. Good luc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00282.html (8,886 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III); Date: Fri Jul 31 12:20:12 1998; You could, and even as N5IA suggests we dont even have to wait until the next contest we can do it with old logs but, changing the scoring will change the way the contest is operated. At 6D2X we usua; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00283.html (9,177 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth Earl Harker); Date: Fri Jul 31 14:32:29 1998; This would be interesting, but not entirely meaningful. If the scoring system changes, most contesters would probably re-evaluate their strategies and adapt to maximize their scores, and such an anal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00284.html (10,244 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Fri Jul 31 13:24:24 1998; Shooting from the hip here - if the proposal was "outside your own zone" instead of "outside your own country", it would reduce the big-country/little-country lopsidedness. In this way I could still; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00287.html (12,426 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Fri Jul 31 16:53:16 1998; This is the first thing I have seen posted to the contest reflector by K1EA in years. Maybe ever. If this idea stimulated Kenny to agree, then damn it... it must be a good idea! :) Which of course it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00288.html (8,356 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: w3cf@email.msn.com (Douglas Priest); Date: Fri Jul 31 18:01:58 1998; 3 points for all out of country Q's while maintaining the zone and country mults? I think I can speak for my fellow V2 brethren that we whole heartily agree!!! Though I'm not sure our friends on P4 a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00289.html (8,335 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: k4lt@fuse.net (Doug Klein); Date: Fri Jul 31 19:07:44 1998; N6TJ: K4LT: I like the idea. Of course, it could directly benefit me, too. So, I guess I am a little biased. If we had gotten 3 points per qso from VP5FOC and VP5VW in 1995 and 1994, we would have wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00290.html (8,398 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: w2xx@cloud9.net (w2xx@cloud9.net); Date: Sat Aug 1 10:44:22 1998; Hi Jim (and the rest of the gang): I like your scoring idea, but think it might be improved even further by making all contacts out of your ZONE count 3 points. All contacts within the zone count zip; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00001.html (7,948 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy L. Olinger); Date: Sat Aug 1 11:03:51 1998; An idea that remains a favorite of mine: Your own zone 0 points. A zone that touches yours or same country 1 point. All others 3 points. I think folks could score that in a paper log. 73, y'all. -- G; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00002.html (8,357 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: K2KW@prodigy.net (Ken Silverman); Date: Sat Aug 1 09:54:15 1998; In the 1997 CQ WW CW Contest 5V7A and 6Y4A multi/multi stations had a (very) friendly bet going. High score wins - but scoring between the two stations was essentially changed to a "line" score, wher; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00007.html (8,482 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: no6x@inreach.com (Mike); Date: Sun Aug 2 08:30:53 1998; I think this is the best idea yet. Like Ward said it would eliminate the Big-country little country complaint. Then again, I think no matter how fair you try to make it there will always be somone th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00011.html (8,936 bytes)
19. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Sun Aug 2 14:52:02 1998; One more innovative idea: Let's get the CW contest away from Thanksgiving weekend! -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA FRC alternate: barry@w2up.wells.com -- CQ-Contest on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00015.html (8,148 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: k4lt@fuse.net (Doug Klein); Date: Sun Aug 2 11:59:56 1998; It's only Thanksgiving in one country. Hardly a reason to move the date. 73, Doug K4LT -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00016.html (7,896 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]