Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Icom\s+736\s+receiver\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Icom\s+736\s+receiver\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Icom 736 receiver (score: 1): Author: "John" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:04:13 -0500; What is the receiver like on the Icom 736, and how well is it at handling noise? Would it be a big step up from an Icom 706 in terms of performance and handling different types of noise? 73s John W5T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00263.html (6,777 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Icom 736 receiver (score: 1): Author: Martin Monsalvo <mmonsalvo@lombardilujan.com.ar>; Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:47:43 -0300; I've been using IC 736 at LU4DX during CQ WW CW contests together with an MFJ external DSP. It works great! I like it very much. Last year I worked 142 countries on 15 m. SOSB 15 (A). Signals were do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00267.html (8,081 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]