Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Ideal\s+Transceiver\s+Discussion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Ideal\s+Transceiver\s+Discussion\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Wed Jul 9 10:53:16 1997; A friend of mine just purchased an ICOM 765 and I have been looking at my TS850 with a jaundice eye. Should I trade? Should I move from Kenwood to something else. I've been a Kenwood guy since the 52; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00072.html (9,300 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Thu Jul 10 09:39:04 1997; Guys and Gals...you missed the point of the discussion. I don't want to discuss the finer points of already existing rigs. Everyone knows those things ad naseum. What I want to discuss is what you wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00088.html (8,148 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: leith@inhb.co.nz (Leith Jennings); Date: Fri Jul 11 21:51:14 1997; Funny thing about tranceivers and radio design. What makes that perfect tranceiver or radio "feel" right and "look" right?. I don't have an answer but I can give you examples. The Collins KWM2 and 75; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00100.html (10,811 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Fri Jul 11 16:21:31 1997; Back in the 50's, National Radio had a campaign going where they asked the amateurs what they wanted in a radio. After a few months, they took all the features they had received and created the NC-30; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00108.html (9,138 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Wed Jul 9 10:53:16 1997; A friend of mine just purchased an ICOM 765 and I have been looking at my TS850 with a jaundice eye. Should I trade? Should I move from Kenwood to something else. I've been a Kenwood guy since the 52; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00319.html (9,413 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Thu Jul 10 09:39:04 1997; Guys and Gals...you missed the point of the discussion. I don't want to discuss the finer points of already existing rigs. Everyone knows those things ad naseum. What I want to discuss is what you wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00335.html (8,143 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: leith@inhb.co.nz (Leith Jennings); Date: Fri Jul 11 21:51:14 1997; Funny thing about tranceivers and radio design. What makes that perfect tranceiver or radio "feel" right and "look" right?. I don't have an answer but I can give you examples. The Collins KWM2 and 75; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00347.html (10,825 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Fri Jul 11 16:21:31 1997; Back in the 50's, National Radio had a campaign going where they asked the amateurs what they wanted in a radio. After a few months, they took all the features they had received and created the NC-30; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00355.html (9,148 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Wed Jul 9 10:53:16 1997; A friend of mine just purchased an ICOM 765 and I have been looking at my TS850 with a jaundice eye. Should I trade? Should I move from Kenwood to something else. I've been a Kenwood guy since the 52; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00552.html (9,401 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Thu Jul 10 09:39:04 1997; Guys and Gals...you missed the point of the discussion. I don't want to discuss the finer points of already existing rigs. Everyone knows those things ad naseum. What I want to discuss is what you wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00568.html (8,140 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: leith@inhb.co.nz (Leith Jennings); Date: Fri Jul 11 21:51:14 1997; Funny thing about tranceivers and radio design. What makes that perfect tranceiver or radio "feel" right and "look" right?. I don't have an answer but I can give you examples. The Collins KWM2 and 75; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00580.html (10,785 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Fri Jul 11 16:21:31 1997; Back in the 50's, National Radio had a campaign going where they asked the amateurs what they wanted in a radio. After a few months, they took all the features they had received and created the NC-30; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00588.html (9,149 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]