Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+If\s+You\s+Don\'t\s+QSL\,\s+LISTEN\s+UP\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+If\s+You\s+Don\'t\s+QSL\,\s+LISTEN\s+UP\!\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: f5nly@tiscali.fr (F5NLY); Date: Wed Aug 6 18:28:29 2003; If someone send his QSL to you, he needs yours. You do must reply to all requests, using the same way? in a correct delay. Courtesy is, my politic is. 73 Lee. (TM5C manager around 30k QSL/year); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00137.html (8,476 bytes)
22. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: marc.wullaert3@pandora.be (Marc Wullaert ON4MA); Date: Wed Aug 6 20:17:12 2003; 33K band/mode $2000 is a nut if you see all the hardware/stations you have at KC1XX !! A lot of bigguns are showing the world how tey construct super big stations on the web but QSL-CARDS are to expe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00138.html (10,179 bytes)
23. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: headrick@radar.nrl.navy.mil (James Headrick); Date: Wed Aug 6 21:13:06 2003; I can't think of any reason for failure to respond to a SASE request for a QSL. Even if you don't have any cards you can write the confirmation info on a piece of paper or the senders card and return; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00141.html (9,033 bytes)
24. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Wed Aug 6 22:02:16 2003; Even easier, write "CONFIRMED by" on the back, sign your name and callsign, date it and return the card. ZL3GQ used to do this. Syl, VE5ZX did this for me recently to confirm an unusual Canadian pref; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00148.html (8,515 bytes)
25. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: ke9r@ke9r.com (ke9r@ke9r.com); Date: Thu Aug 7 00:10:41 2003; At Dayton this year, I am going to conduct a experiment! I will walk up famous contesters, hand them (2) quarters, a piece of gum, than smile at them. Those who steal the quarters, throw the gum on t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00150.html (7,361 bytes)
26. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: wrt@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Thu Aug 7 07:47:08 2003; _________________________________________________________ In case I don't make it to Dayton, can you just mail me the quarters? -- 73, Bill W7TI; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00152.html (7,709 bytes)
27. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Thu Aug 7 12:35:24 2003; I think what would be helpful to everyone, is if each person stated his QSLing policy on his QRZ.COM listing. If you require greenbacks instead of IRCs, if you QSL only via the buro, if you don't ans; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00159.html (9,151 bytes)
28. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: nat@ajheatwole.com (Nat Heatwole); Date: Thu Aug 7 15:41:33 2003; But you still have plenty of time to send messages to CQ-Contest? :-) 73, Nat, WZ3AR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00161.html (8,976 bytes)
29. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: jonathan.schulz@siemens.com (Schulz Jonathan); Date: Thu Aug 7 16:27:18 2003; only if you are a "famous" contester 73 Jon K9JS not famous and not really expecting to be ;-); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00163.html (9,799 bytes)
30. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: nat@ajheatwole.com (Nat Heatwole); Date: Thu Aug 7 20:31:47 2003; Since my post to the reflector a few days ago I have received lots of e-mails, both from people who share my viewpoints and those who have opposing viewpoints. After sifting through all of them, ther; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00166.html (11,958 bytes)
31. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@quadnet.net (Bob Wanderer); Date: Thu Aug 7 22:21:00 2003; Here's another "take" on the matter, insofar as DX QSLs are concerned. In December 2002, the W0 bureau informed me that I had cards there but had run out of "envelope credits." I promptly sent the re; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00168.html (10,782 bytes)
32. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@quadnet.net (Bob Wanderer); Date: Thu Aug 7 22:21:14 2003; That's why I use mint stamps of the country I'm sending the QSL to. Plus SAE of course. 100% success rate so far. I lived overseas for a while and operated from there. IRCs were a pain, especially si; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00169.html (12,257 bytes)
33. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: GaryK9GS@wi.rr.com (Gary K9GS); Date: Fri Aug 8 01:07:47 2003; I think the results of this experiment would be much more interesting if tequila were substituted for the chewing gum. 73, Gary ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ K9GS Gary Schwartz ema; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00170.html (8,891 bytes)
34. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com (Blake Meinecke); Date: Fri Aug 8 07:49:35 2003; Nobody looks there. As an example, I just yesterday go another QSL card (no SASE) forwarded to me yesterday from my 1+ year old address! I guess it will stop when the USPS stops forwarding my mail. I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00171.html (9,187 bytes)
35. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1): Author: k0xu@iowadsl.net (Jim Rhodes); Date: Fri Aug 8 09:20:36 2003; I too have had less than acceptable service from the 0 bureau since they moved it to Kansas City. Sometimes more than a year between envelopes. The money I send seems to be used up much quicker than; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00173.html (9,639 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 35
Page: [1] [2]