The purpose of this post is to present a way to implement a dynamic error free Skimmer-RBN/Packet network that automatically: 1. Flags and eliminates Busted Spots from the network 2. Flags and elimin
The RBN team was delighted to get an advance copy of this message yesterday. |We've barely begun to explore Jose's VBA-enabled spreadsheet, but it's obvious that he's drawn on his experience as a wor
CT1BOH wrote: But the majority is "spots" send by skimmers, of stations calling RUN stations. These spots should never be sent out to the network by skimmer. Jose is certified Runner but I am glad he
Very well done Jose. Thank you much. I have enjoyed reading it. Couple of thoughts came to my mind. There are instances where one station can be heard on several frequencies. 1) Stations with parasit
I would be in favor of an RBN feature which deliberately introduced random suffix errors into the output stream. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing l
I guess no stations can call CQ on alternate frequencies on the same band now (MS/M2/MM)... Vy 73. Martin, LU5DX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@con
Some CC Clusters are now using a filter to remove busted RBN Skimmer spots. These clusters include VE7CC-1, AE5E-1, and VE1DXI. Some calls are busted more often than they are correct. IS0BOY is one o
And this is bad because... ? --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Martin , LU5DX Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:32 PM To: CQ-Contest Subject
Not saying that preventing MS/M2/MM from alternating CQ is a bad thing at all. I fully agree with the rule. I was just saying that no stations are supposed to dual CQ on the same band, eliminating th