Yes, this weekend during the CQ 160m CW contest, there were lots of inconsiderate CW operators, operating way above 1843 kHz -- I heard some of them as high as 1880 kHz. There's plenty of space for C
Now Bill, if you had taken a little time to think before you spoke, you would not have stated your frustration as you have. If you would have actually listened, you would have found, as I did, that t
Oh, I think I thought about this a lot.... Yup. No, it wouldn't. Doug, I wasn't really, really serious about that posting. The <grin> at the end should have given that away. My point was to highlight
.......... "In a few weeks when the CQ 160m SSB contest runs, I hope we don't have similar complaints about SSB operators below 1843 kHz." Well, I'm sure there will no complaints if the phone portion
I guess I better not bring up JA3YBK on/or about 1820 saying QSX 1943 for hours. 73 MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm Yes, this weekend during the CQ 160m CW contest, t
OH, I would count on it.... someone will be unhappy that they couldn't talk with their cohorts and spend a nice evening discussing... oh.. some ill r something. And there will be just no room for cw
Bill: As N2AA has said in the past, "GOT ONE!" de Doug KR2Q _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
I get a kick out of folks, who when THEY want some operating restriction that the regs don't call for, they start labeling other ops as "inconsiderate", or some other pejorative name... I would sugge
What ??????? I must of been operating a different contest. During the primetime operating hours there wasn't a clear spot anywhere below 1870 Khz. I even heard guys like VY2ZM running EU up above 187