Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Innovative\s+Idea\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Innovative\s+Idea\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA (score: 1): Author: GW4BLE@BTINTERNET.COM (GW4BLE); Date: Sat Aug 1 21:12:51 1998; de GW4BLE Input from here in Europe - YES! Go for Jim's suggestion, no variations to complicate the issue please. Steve GW4BLE@btinternet.com -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00009.html (7,462 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Innovative Idea (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Sun Aug 2 13:36:24 1998; Been watching the thread on scoring, both for the CQ WW recently, and further back, for the CQ WPX. The central issue of the debate seems to be fairness, as it gets skewed by the accidents of politic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00020.html (9,020 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Innovative Idea (score: 1): Author: w2vjn@rosenet.net (George Cutsogeorge); Date: Sun Aug 2 13:02:09 1998; Jim has an excellant idea and it surely will help increase participation. Eliminating the zero pointers would also help. Since the CQ contests use the CQ Zones as multipliers, why not use the Zones t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00026.html (7,761 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA (score: 1): Author: S56A@S55TCP.ampr.org (Marijan Miletic); Date: Mon Aug 3 06:49:50 1998; I fully support N6TJ altruistic idea for CQ WW scoring IMPROVEMENT! Recently I went thru the open process of defining the rules (and scoring) of the new (Aug. 30-31) Slovenian Contest Club RTTY Champ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00034.html (8,161 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA (score: 1): Author: margoh@compuserve.com (Hill, Russell C.); Date: Mon Aug 3 09:20:09 1998; In reference to Mario, S56A, idea about using US Call Areas, since the applicability of Call Areas here is only a fond nostalgic memory, the idea does not seem practical, unless the call area is part; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00037.html (7,972 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Mon Aug 3 11:11:41 1998; << BTW, I think you would be surprised how many non-Americans subscribe to CQ Mag. I've been a subscriber for five years, and I know a lot of others who subscribe too. Several truisms to keep in mind; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00040.html (8,728 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon Aug 3 11:53:18 1998; Actually the contest results issues are their poorest selling issues. Cheers, Steve K7LXC http://www.championradio.com -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00044.html (7,849 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Innovative Idea (score: 1): Author: bobkathylangham@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (Bob N8YGG); Date: Mon Aug 3 21:01:53 1998; Bob N8YGG -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00060.html (9,304 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] Innovative Idea (score: 1): Author: vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR98BrettGraham); Date: Tue Aug 4 09:47:28 1998; While a 3/3/0 (different continent/same continent/same country) Q point structure for CQ WW has its merits, as I mull things over on my own & watch the discussion generally deteriorate, I still keep; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00073.html (8,725 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Innovative Idea (score: 1): Author: slazar19@sgi.net (Spencer Lazar); Date: Tue Aug 4 12:58:36 1998; Contesters, Rule changes? Attention All: There will be no rule changes! What say K3EST? All the quibbling is about points and equity. Everyone wants to gain something but give up nothing. Typical con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00079.html (8,421 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Innovative Idea (score: 1): Author: n7ng@m4.sprynet.com (n7ng@m4.sprynet.com); Date: Wed Aug 5 09:17:23 1998; Seriously, what would make a lot of sense if making the "EU" one entity. Now that would give our European contest friends something to think about... Wayne, N7NG -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00095.html (9,418 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]