Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Is\s+it\s+a\s+time\s+to\s+changerulesfor\s+HQstnsin\s+IARUcontest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Is\s+it\s+a\s+time\s+to\s+changerulesfor\s+HQstnsin\s+IARUcontest\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to changerulesfor HQstnsin IARUcontest (score: 1): Author: "Vladimir V. Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:33:26 +0100; Hi Mark, All correct, it would fundamentally change the game. Let's narrow the circle. No problem if a casual operator comes and makes a couple of contacts. Fine, if he even sends a log, he can compe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00226.html (10,747 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to changerulesfor HQstnsin IARUcontest (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:12:27 +0200; That is a good idea and the log checkers won´t kill you when those stations are obligated to send in a Cabrillo log. With that number of qsos they are most likely bite by the contest bacillus a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00230.html (9,496 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]