Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+K5D\s+in\s+ARRL\s+CW\s+\=\s+it\s+WAS\s+them\s+\(real\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] K5D in ARRL CW = it WAS them (real) (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:02:43 +0000 (GMT)
Someone pointed me to their web page where you can do a log lookup. I am in the log on the right day, band, etc., so it must have been them. Almost thought that I had lost a mult. Whew! :-) de Doug K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00360.html (7,083 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] K5D in ARRL CW = it WAS them (real) (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:30:06 -0600
Neither of the sites I know of - http://www.kp5.us http://www.logsearch.de give you a day. They just give a band/mode. It looks like you have two QSO's on 40 CW in the log. Did they give you a contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00367.html (8,069 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] K5D in ARRL CW = it WAS them (real) (score: 1)
Author: "Felipe J Hernandez" <fhdez@islandnetjm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:39:06 -0400
Guys a desicion was made to work a bit of 10 mtrs during arrl dx just to log some qsos on the band... (it has been completely closed down here) and on those contest exchanges happened..as far as the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00379.html (9,508 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] K5D in ARRL CW = it WAS them (real) (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:05:03 -0700
Yes they gave out the proper exchange. The online log does not give dates but the list is order of oldest contact on top. My last contact is 40m cw. It was for real. "A slip of the foot you may soon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00380.html (9,404 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] K5D in ARRL CW = it WAS them (real) (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:45:15 -0700
Felipe, The 40m op was giving out his power. I worked them and listened to the exchanges. I can't speak to the 10 or 160m operations as I didn't hear them. "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00388.html (10,750 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] K5D in ARRL CW = it WAS them (real) (score: 1)
Author: "Bud Semon N7CW" <n7cw@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:18:54 -0700
Actually, the station sent 599 K, which is exactly what hundreds of the other contest stations were sending, meaning 59 KW. Whether or not the intent was to contest or not, the operator knew that we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00390.html (10,668 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] K5D in ARRL CW = it WAS them (real) (score: 1)
Author: "Felipe J Hernandez" <fhdez@islandnetjm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:24:21 -0400
hi hi.. well there you go. at least we gave out some qsos.. I bet the receivers are happy.. the intentions were pure.. not to create trouble for contesters.. oh well.. this reminds me of jurassic par
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00394.html (11,891 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] K5D in ARRL CW = it WAS them (real) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:33:13 -0500
Well, what's the worst that can happen? They made a few contest QSO's after all, send in their log, and win their DXCC entity? Actually, the station sent 599 K, which is exactly what hundreds of the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00403.html (11,715 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu