Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+K9YC\,\s+WRTC\,\s+deep\s+pockets\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] K9YC, WRTC, deep pockets (score: 1)
Author: <kr2q@optimum.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 12:43:00 GMT
KR2Q sez: Yes, I agree. I's that way in contesting. It's that way in everything. Scar (Lion King) sez: Life's not fair, is it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMzPsOy-pe4 If a more equitable way can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00147.html (6,912 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] K9YC, WRTC, deep pockets (score: 1)
Author: Mike Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 15:28:00 +0000 (UTC)
You are spot on, Doug. If you look at just about any of the professional sports teams, (or even the Olympics), WRTC (for the most part) is not much different. The guys with the most resources (take t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00148.html (9,284 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] K9YC, WRTC, deep pockets (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 21:23:32 +0300
What Ranko proposed was that the potential qualifiers will commit to letting anybody into their station for inspection at any time during any qualifying contest (ideally this should still be agreed a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00149.html (8,661 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] K9YC, WRTC, deep pockets (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 20:44:52 +0000
This is a joke, right? Inspectors? Will they bring dogs, urine test kits, yellow police tape? This is about AMATEURs, guys playing electronic splatball with our toy radios? __________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00151.html (10,528 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] K9YC, WRTC, deep pockets (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:29:19 -0700
I can see a new tactic on the horizon. Send a friend to inspect the station of a major competitor to disrupt their concentration. Even better, send a constant stream of visitors so the op never reall
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00171.html (11,487 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] K9YC, WRTC, deep pockets (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 17:38:46 -0400
The real question is, why do we (or at least many of us) feel the need for "inspectors" or "referees" to visit contest stations in operation during major contests? Look, either you trust someone, or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00178.html (13,958 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] K9YC, WRTC, deep pockets (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:11:47 +0200
I have the feeling that the Balkan region is suggesting that the way to go with self-regulation is to have 4KW+ amplifiers as well as switches, filters and combiners for that power level. 73 Peter, D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00193.html (9,099 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] K9YC, WRTC, deep pockets (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:53:40 -0600
How do you solve the problem of people not trusting one another? Too many contests with too many sponsors and very little consistency in how the rules are enforced. The Olympics have their own unique
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00207.html (18,592 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu