Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+KPA\s+1500\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] KPA 1500 (score: 1)
Author: Richard Zalewski <dick.w7zr@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 12:52:19 -0700
Anyone considering the KPA 1500? Looking for any pros or cons as best as we can tell prior to first deliveries. Richard *W7ZR* ex:5C5Z, CN2ZR, K2JSP, W6SBZ, W7KXR, K9ZIJ, W9KNF, W0KDF, W0MQU, J68ZR,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00210.html (6,621 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] KPA 1500 (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 23:23:31 -0400
I am not considering it but I am familiar with the technology. Pros: 2x LDMOS, 1500W out with better IMD than just 1 device Supports adaptive predistortion Has a LAN port for something, who knows, bu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00211.html (7,855 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] KPA 1500 (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:43:46 -0500
I love seperate amp power supplies. I can warm my feet on them! :-) Chuck W5PR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00213.html (9,007 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] KPA 1500 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:51:39 -0700
The poop sheet says that the amp CAN be used for SO2R with EXTERNAL control of the switching, Duty cycle spec implies that it IS rated for heavy duty SO2R CW and SSB, but not RTTY (30 min keydown), s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00216.html (9,773 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] KPA 1500 (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:15:16 -0400
Jim - Saying you can do SO2R with external switching is the same as saying the amp doesn't have SO2R built in. As for the cost, SPE amps have it and the 1.3K-FA can be had for less than the cost of t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00217.html (10,584 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] KPA 1500 (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@rac.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:34:36 -0400
I have a 2K-FA and I can say it is not really SO2R as it. You only have one antenna input for the 2sd radio just to say it is SO2R but actually you cannot share antennas between radios to make actual
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00220.html (12,018 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] KPA 1500 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 17:03:18 -0700
I buy equipment based on REAL specs that I can trust from mfrs I trust for support, quality, and reliability.  I want my signal to be very clean. With the amps I own, the output signal is as clean as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00222.html (9,460 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] KPA 1500 (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 23:50:27 -0400
I am a bit open minded about what I choose with regard to equipment. The Elecraft KPA1500 design is similar to pretty much any 2 device LDMOS amplifier as there is really not much to change in the RF
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00226.html (10,960 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu