Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Kenwood\s+for\s+Contesting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Kenwood\s+for\s+Contesting\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Kenwood for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:51:01 -0600; Would any of you guys consider any Kenwood model of Contest quality? I have not heard much abt them in regards to contesting. I have an FT-1000MP MKV with the DVS-2 and FH-1 along with the narrow CW; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00404.html (7,338 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:27:45 -0800; I have used, and continue to use, Kenwood TS-850SATs for phone contesting. They are getting to be old, though, so reliability may be a problem. Icom and Yaesu have been aggressively courting the cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00407.html (7,625 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:02:17 -0500; I am using Kenwood TS-570DG as a second radio and for DXpeditions. Never had a problem, this Radio is a Tank. Two other companies are aggressive: they even taking older Kenwood radios numbers for the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00410.html (9,859 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "W4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:47:08 -0500; I still have my TS-950SDX/SM230 which is a great radio. I did think my TS-930SAT was the best until I spent an afternoon with a FT-1000D many years ago. Sold the TS-930SAT the next day. Jon Hamlet, W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00412.html (9,471 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:40:53 -0600; The TS-850 was the last real contest-grade Kenwood produced: it had it all, great receiver, great filter flexibility, excellent transmit audio, quick antenna tuner, great frequency flexibility and ex; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00414.html (9,748 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Dennis Vernacchia" <n6ki73@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:54:06 -0800; A TS-950SDX is no slouch of a rig and Kenwood's last rig before putting out a bunch of inferior rigs like the TS-2000 and TS-870 So it and it's baby brother the TS-850 continue to be good rigs. The o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00416.html (9,628 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 08:29:42 -0500; Dennis Vernacchia wrote: "A TS-950SDX is no slouch of a rig and Kenwood's last rig before putting out a bunch of inferior rigs like the TS-2000 and TS-870" I've never owned a TS-950DX, so I can't com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00417.html (8,056 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:07:57 -0800; Bob, AD5VJ, inquired: I have been using Kenwood TS-480 rigs for several years now. The RX is better than my TS-870's (2 are still sitting on the floor). Since I also do portable operating (CQP, IOTA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00424.html (8,910 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]