Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Key\s+Clicks\s+in\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+CW\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:50:40 -0500
W1AEX already beat you to it, at least for SSB. In the spirit of getting into the proper frame of mind for ARRL Phone, you can view his "Hall of Infamy" at: http://www.w1aex.com/hoi/hall_of_infamy.ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00128.html (9,344 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:31:10 -0500
I used a K3s last weekend and used a different radio in CQ WW CW. I spent about the same amount of time running but I definitely experienced more key clicks in this contest. It is very likely that th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00150.html (8,420 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:24:28 -0900
I think the thing to do is send an email to the offender ..letting him/her know about the clicking. If/until I know otherwise...I assume people want to know if they are causing problems. 73 Steve KL7
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00168.html (9,898 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: alannottage--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:06:43 -0500
I have an Inrad 400Hz filter in my old radio. Lovely filter (great shape factor) but not much use now that folk are spaced at 300Hz intervals, alas :<( Al G0XBV I used a K3s last weekend and used a d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00181.html (9,928 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: John E Bastin <jbastin@sssnet.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:55:58 -0500
That may be, but its a fact of life and one we just have to live with (at least for now). I wound up moving several times last weekend for just that very reason. There *is* another advantage of the P
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00182.html (8,780 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Scott Ellington <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:36:15 -0600
My old FT-1000 sits right next to the K3, one flip of a switch away. Perhaps I should take out the W8JI mod, and make the FT-1000 back into one of the worst click generators around, and switch to it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00185.html (7,755 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:25:03 +0200
Al, If you use noise blanker, it takes the signal input before the 400Hz filter. The filter for the blanker width is 12kHz or so. There are many things that can go wrong, producing effects to the ear
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00224.html (11,061 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu