Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LR\s+vs\s+LPL\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] LR vs LPL (score: 1)
Author: frenaye@pcnet.com (Tom Frenaye)
Date: Sun Feb 25 15:26:35 2001
W3LPL K3LR 39.28n77.02w 41.18n80.5w CT 38.7n 9.2w 3555mi 3674mi CU 37.7n 25.7w 2742 2888 DL 50.7n 7.0e 3959 4009 EI 53.3n 6.3w 3366 3418 UA3 55.8n 37.6e 4839 4827 UT 50.4n 30.5e 4852 4869 Calculation
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00185.html (9,476 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] LR vs LPL (score: 1)
Author: NQ4I@compuserve.com (Rick Dougherty)
Date: Sun Feb 25 15:54:23 2001
f1PKshu32297 Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/cq-contest X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C do the math and you will see that NQ4I h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00186.html (7,551 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] LR vs LPL (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner)
Date: Sun Feb 25 21:32:55 2001
There has to be more to it than the absolute distance to Europe, and having sunset 20-30 mins earlier on the coast. I remember when I lived in NH, about 1 mile from the ocean, EU was LOUD on my attic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00188.html (11,633 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] LR vs LPL (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Sun Feb 25 17:33:35 2001
I was at K1EA's station at the bottom of the last cycle for CQWW CW and the differences between here and there are more pronounced than a sunset time would indicate. I believe that their proximity to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00194.html (7,477 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] LR vs LPL (score: 1)
Author: frenaye@pcnet.com (Tom Frenaye)
Date: Sun Feb 25 18:37:39 2001
I agree with that to a point. At some point you end up too far north and the auroral oval starts to eat away at signal strengths much of the time. Of course, in CQWW the stations to the north seemed
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00198.html (8,827 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] LR vs LPL (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun Feb 25 20:10:02 2001
I'm not sure if this is what Bill meant, but having more of the refraction zone in darkness would result in lower absorption. And, of course, being one hop closer means a lower total path loss. That
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00204.html (8,267 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu