Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Last\s+2\s+Revisited\s+and\s+Another\s+Question\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Last 2 Revisited and Another Question (score: 1)
Author: KK7SR@arrl.net (KK7SR@arrl.net)
Date: Mon Aug 2 17:23:24 1999
Greetings - Thanks again for the tips and suggestions on full call sign useage during contests. I spent a lot of time listening this weekend and found myself hoping I didn't sound like a few of the h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00014.html (8,089 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Last 2 Revisited and Another Question (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon Aug 2 21:10:40 1999
No huh involved. You might be a *real* 5 by 9 but if he's got a 40 db over or more adjacent signal (and who doesn't?), you will probably need to repeat some info. Happens ALL the time. Those who can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00017.html (8,147 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Last 2 Revisited and Another Question (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue Aug 3 08:13:25 1999
But let's face it, you and I and everyone knows that virtually NO ONE gives "rea" signal reports during contests or even DX-Peditions (happens a little more here). If you can copy them it's "59." The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00019.html (9,473 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Last 2 Revisited and Another Question (score: 1)
Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Tue Aug 3 10:37:52 1999
Hi Mel: I think one of the reasons that many of us (myself included) give out a lot of 59 and 599 reports that we don't really mean in contests is that two of the three contest logging programs I am
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00027.html (9,520 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Last 2 Revisited and Another Question (score: 1)
Author: KK7SR@arrl.net (KK7SR@arrl.net)
Date: Mon Aug 2 17:23:24 1999
Greetings - Thanks again for the tips and suggestions on full call sign useage during contests. I spent a lot of time listening this weekend and found myself hoping I didn't sound like a few of the h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00275.html (8,118 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Last 2 Revisited and Another Question (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon Aug 2 21:10:40 1999
No huh involved. You might be a *real* 5 by 9 but if he's got a 40 db over or more adjacent signal (and who doesn't?), you will probably need to repeat some info. Happens ALL the time. Those who can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00278.html (8,144 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Last 2 Revisited and Another Question (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue Aug 3 08:13:25 1999
But let's face it, you and I and everyone knows that virtually NO ONE gives "rea" signal reports during contests or even DX-Peditions (happens a little more here). If you can copy them it's "59." The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00280.html (9,488 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Last 2 Revisited and Another Question (score: 1)
Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Tue Aug 3 10:37:52 1999
Hi Mel: I think one of the reasons that many of us (myself included) give out a lot of 59 and 599 reports that we don't really mean in contests is that two of the three contest logging programs I am
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00288.html (9,517 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu