Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Line\s+Scores\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Line\s+Scores\s*$/: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:32:04 -0800; few Qs. It was exciting-- recognition that I belonged. I hate it that they do not publish Not picking on Rusty in particular... Lets be clear - the ARRL *also* hates that they can't publish line sco; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00088.html (10,268 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:41:01 -0800 (PST); SO why are Field Day line scores still published? They probably make up more pages than all the other contests combined. 73s JOhn NE0P (http://www.designet.com/k1ir/Downloads/ContestProposal_071702.p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00090.html (11,997 bytes)
3. RE: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:42:36 -00; Ya mean like those know-nothings over at CQ? Line-scores are alive and well over there. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contestin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00091.html (9,658 bytes)
4. RE: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:47:56 -0800 (PST); True, but if they had their way CW testing and CW subbands wouldn't be. John NE0P http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the al; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00092.html (10,390 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:57:38 -0800; Because it's "not a contest, it's an operating event" and because it forms a valuable bridge between the non-contest and contest communities. 73, Ward N0AX ___________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00094.html (13,217 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:00:13 -0800; They sponsor four contests per year which are a much bigger part of the CQ presence (and readership). 73, Ward N0AX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00096.html (10,160 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:00:16 -0800; Hogwash! QST is still published so the line scores could still be in there. It's purely a matter of what they choose to print. There are many solutions in addition to the one chosen. Jim, AF6O in and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00097.html (9,365 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:04:46 -0800 (PST); But it is a contest. It has the same goals as a contest, and has contest-type rules. Also, couldn't these technically saavy people find the FD scores on line as well? I wonder if "Up Front in QST" co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00098.html (15,177 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:10:49 -0800; It has rules and it has goals, some of which apply to contests and some of which don't. Groups treat this as everything from a club picnic to a true emergency exercise to a full-blown contest. It may; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00099.html (17,040 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: asciibaron@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 18:12:32 +0000; so why are the entire Field Day scores published. i can not reconcile the above comment with the fact that FD 2004 numbers, ALL numbers appeared in recent issue. what was left out to add the scores?; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00100.html (10,142 bytes)
11. RE: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 18:13:30 -00; Despite your tendency to minimize opposing views with sarcasm, I haven't seen anyone call it an "anti-contester" act. But a lot of people have called it a "stupid" act and a "not paying attention to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00101.html (10,509 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Warren C. Stankiewicz" <nf1j@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:57:37 -0800; Hans, Ward, everybody: Are you sure on this one? When I worked there, and from pronouncements since, the Readex surveys (which ARRL has been using as a sort of bible for quite some time) has indicate; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00104.html (11,575 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:56:04 EST; Yet when QST needed to be "lighten ship", amazingly the three groups which took the hit were DXCCers, Contesters, and "Section News" (the field organization turf of SMs, STMs, and net managers), the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00105.html (9,828 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:03:31 -0000; Congratulations Ward any politician would be proud of you for being able to speak out of both sides of your mouth at the same time without blinking your eyes. I, still, believe there is more to the c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00107.html (12,707 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:06:16 EST; "public service", and providing communications for walkathons, etc.<< Like them guys need to read QST to push the PTT button and yak on handheld? How many SOTBers does it take to equal spending of on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00109.html (9,208 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "George Harlem W1EBI" <w1ebi@lightband.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:12:27 -0500; Statistically I seriously doubt that contesters could possibly be the largest QST subscriber group. And before "taking action", you might keep in mind that ARRL also publishes a separate periodical a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00111.html (14,769 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: asciibaron@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 19:12:34 +0000; there was a comment regarding the data showing up on the web and that being a good place for data. and another comment proclaimed that the under 40 crowd was more focused on the Internet and less on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00112.html (10,412 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:25:14 -00; George, To "set the tone" for my response, this thread morphed from a discussion about the thrill a of newcomer seeing his call in print in a national magazine. NCJ (despite the "N" in it's name) is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00114.html (9,928 bytes)
19. RE: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:37:20 -0600; So many opinions about the significance of contester, so little facts. Number of call signs worked in CQ WW from CN8WW: 10,000 (out of about 25,000 QSOs, as I recall) Number of call signs workd in a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00115.html (9,368 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:39:04 -00; No, (despite all my grousing about line scores and section news) "first and foremost" ARRL is a single voice in the wilderness valiantly attempting to "save ham radio as we know it". For no other re; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00116.html (9,884 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]