Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Listening\s+to\s+K5ZD\s+audio\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Listening\s+to\s+K5ZD\s+audio\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Listening to K5ZD audio (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:25:57 EDT; In a message dated 10/26/05 1:11:58 PM Greenwich Standard Time, w0mu@w0mu.com writes: Define use. The remote station is not in control of the receiver and has no knowledge of the frequency in use. ~~; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00571.html (6,843 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Listening to K5ZD audio (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 26 Oct 2005 09:11:09 -0500; The difference is that your SO2R second radio is within 500m of the rest of your station. I *do* believe that using the K5ZD live audio at a single-op-unassisted station is against the rules. At a mu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00573.html (8,443 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Listening to K5ZD audio (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 21:38:41 -0500; I would like to say this with the greatest of respect for all people sharing their opinions, but really, did anybody even listen to the K5ZD audio before proffering an opinion? Sheesh, all I heard wa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00630.html (10,793 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]