Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LoTW\s+and\s+contest\s+submissions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LoTW\s+and\s+contest\s+submissions\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] LoTW and contest submissions (score: 1): Author: "B. Scott Andersen" <bsandersen@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:44:49 -0500; The efficacy of LoTW continues to be discussed. Of 7300+ QSOs I have 1775 QSL records. This represents a 24% hit rate. I a still do not have DXCC or even WAS with LoTW, though both awards hang on the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00481.html (8,889 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW and contest submissions (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:53:58 -0500; My recent experience is that more and more contesters ARE submitting their logs to LotW. One recent contest (Pa QSO Party) showed a 25% hit rate almost immediately on my personal log upload, and the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00492.html (11,901 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW and contest submissions (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Frugoli" <alfred.frugoli@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:20:49 -0500; On the other hand, my general logging program doesn't do my general logging. So, after the contest is over I import my log into DXKeeper (my general logging program). DXKeeper allows me to upload dir; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00496.html (14,186 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW and contest submissions (score: 1): Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:23:17 +0100; Any software-tweaking couldn´t solve the basic problem for a real boost in acceptance: the limited spectrum of awards covered. If it is to deliver "matches" a narrow focus on two awards won&acu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00502.html (7,890 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]