Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+Checking\s+Software\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+Checking\s+Software\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Software (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 19:26:16 -0700; on. Come now. If *anyone* can define "right" sufficiently well such that a 100% iron-clad, won't-fail, catches-everything-misses-nothing algorithm can be developed from the definition it will be a f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00200.html (10,232 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Software (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 07:44:58 -0400; At 10:26 PM 9/17/2003, Ward Silver wrote: Are there more important things? You bet there are. Catching cheaters, reducing reporting turnaround time, making it easier for people to submit logs, extend; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00207.html (8,769 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Software (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kharker@cs.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:54:40 -0500; -- -- Kenneth E. Harker "Vox Clamantis in Deserto" kharker@cs.utexas.edu University of Texas at Austin Amateur Radio Callsign: WM5R Department of the Computer Sciences Central Texas DX & Contest Club; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00212.html (9,227 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Software (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:27:43 -0700; worrying That argument confuses accuracy for precision. There will always be races that are determined by margins smaller than the margin of error of the log checking process. Always. Why? The small; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00220.html (11,624 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]