The reporting from the SS log checking is a wonderful=20 change for the better. In contesting, more information=20 is always better than less. So, even though my own=20 report shows I copy CW too poo
About all this is going to do is cause the casual CW contester to stop entering. No one for whatever reason wants to be the guy to have any changes made to his log. What I submit is my best shot at w
Actually, I feel exactly the opposite! In most contests (with the exception of November Sweepstakes) I consider myself a casual operator, but take some pride in trying to turn in the mythical golden
Penalies should only be for intentional deception. Miscopying a number should not be. I don't agree. A miscopied report is a blown contact period. The object is to exchange information not you send y
In response to W2CE's comments Bob, I'm really sorry to see you go as I (we) all appreciate the many part timers that make the contests successful. If you read all the postings on this, however, you
i agree with u mike.........mis copy of a letter or a nimber in an occasional call shud not be peanalized......with all due respect i work many JA stns that can't send their call twice the same way.
-- And I certainly hope our JA friends realize this is one persons opinion. For my part, I have no difficulty with them, instead recognizing them to be amoung the top in efficient and courteous opera
Plain and simple JP, Just ask Billy Lunt for copies of the first 3 years SS packet violators I sent him. They were even broken down into requesting section info, making spots, appearing on frequency
It's no longer Billy Lunt's watch. It's Dan Henderson's watch, and he's getting heaps of support from his manager, Bill Kennamer. That was then. This is now. N6TR identified a problem in how the ARR
section Let's face some facts here. A list like would have been worthless. How do you prove something like that? Anyone could claim it was someone else using their call, after all, or that the list