Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+checking\s+and\s+deadlines\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:38:50 -0800
One of the frustrating things I have experienced working as a log checker for a number of contests is how late some of the competitive logs are submitted. There are always some logs - and typically t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00013.html (8,634 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:36:05 -0500
Tree, I think you're being far too lenient. Silly me, I have always expected that if I don't make the deadline I'd better have a darned good reason why not, before asking for an exception. Why should
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00015.html (7,746 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:18:05 -0500
hehe, sounds a bit like my XYL. She considers being a half hour early for something a half hour late. There are many reasons beside massaging the data. I've had people who just plain forgot to send i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00016.html (12,198 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:30:29 -0700
I am all for publishing the date the log was received. I think it is a great idea! There are very few places in the world where there is no internet access. C'mon folks get those logs in. I would sup
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00017.html (9,565 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:42:49 -0500
Hi Mike I do like the idea of bonus points for early submissions. When its a tight race, every little bit helps. However, I do take issue with having everyone use the same logging software. We do hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00022.html (9,227 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:04:18 -0600
I think including the date the log is received in the results is a great idea. No judgment, just more data. Mark, N5OT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00023.html (7,880 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:01:13 +0100
I would propose shorter deadlines, and not posting the logs received till after the deadline. BTW, with shorter deadline, it would be good if the organizing committee would publish the results earlie
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00024.html (10,453 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:42:03 -0500
Ah, but that is one of the problems Tom. Cabrillo is A standard. But not THE standard. I seem to recall a lot of shouting when Cabrillo was announced, developed, and finally introduced... and even im
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00026.html (10,589 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:20:00 -0700
I wonder how many paper logs are still submitted? Ah, but that is one of the problems Tom. Cabrillo is A standard. But not THE standard. I seem to recall a lot of shouting when Cabrillo was announced
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00027.html (11,543 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:33:43 -0800
Hi Tree, My name is Jim and I'm a chronic barely-make-the-deadline guy in most things. Chorus - "Hi Jim" However, I usually don't post my score to 3830 until the same time I submit the log. Why am I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00038.html (13,266 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:41:20 -0500
I think it may depend on the contest Mike. I know quite a few guys who run mobile in the Pa QSO Party, and very few have a laptop in the vehicle. Quite a few used to just xerox, er, photocopy their h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00039.html (12,613 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:14:16 -0500
I have no idea why anyone would be afraid of being sued. Fact is, I can disqualify anyone who I don't like, or if their name is Sam, or anyone with an AA prefix to their callsign. I can do that ya'kn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00043.html (9,872 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:19:26 -0500
Creating A standard in not easy. That said, I think it is safe to say at this point that Cabrillo is THE standard that everyone uses (or could easily adopt as THE standard). I have no doubt there was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00055.html (11,337 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:22:54 -0600
I have not read this entire thread, so pls no one take any offense to what I am about to say, however, I dont understand why there would be any delay in submitting logs in the times we live in. In th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00059.html (11,094 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: "RW4WZ" <rw4wz@udm.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 23:01:18 +0400
Hi Mark, in 2007 we have such a experience in Russian RTTY Cup Contest There was web site which show in real time the date of each log arrived. What is interesting to note that the 3 logs of first 5
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00060.html (9,504 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:38:20 +0100
AD5VJ Bob schreef: What I usually do after a big contest: (I operate from PI4Z which is 10 min drive from home) At 1 AM local time on Monday morning I pack my transceiver and other easy-to-steal equi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00062.html (9,695 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:48:06 -0500
What I would like is a text file with spaces or comma delimiters, that has the expected field in the expected place, with standardized sections for which the logging program cannot enter any ms-spell
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00063.html (12,054 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines (score: 1)
Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:47:48 -0600
I see that as reasonable for someone in your situation what with the travel ect. Its just to those who dont have the load a station like yours would have (DX) or a work load like yours and are simply
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00067.html (11,042 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu