Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+checking\s+anomalies\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+checking\s+anomalies\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Log checking anomalies (score: 1): Author: "Rich K2WR" <k2wr@njdxa.org>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:45:08 +0100; Yuri makes some good points regarding "UN7MMMM" and "JJJ2CJB". Our AH6XX log lost two QSO's with JJ2CJB, and I waited to see what would get stirred up since it seemed likely that this would affect a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00106.html (7,770 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking anomalies (score: 1): Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:18:00 -0400; RE: UN7MMM as UN7MMMM and JJ2CJB as JJJ2CJB The robot at kkn.net expects the call in the subject of the e-mail and in the QSO line as call sent. The wrong call was entered in the qso lines it appears; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00110.html (7,625 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking anomalies (score: 1): Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:30:14 -0400; K9TM and I check the logs for the ARRL 160M and 10M contests, and one of the checks we do on all the log are "errors caused". That is, how many errors did other people get hit with because of the log; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00112.html (9,827 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking anomalies (score: 1): Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:43:55 +0200; David Thompson a écrit : No, it wasn't. All QSO lines in "UN7MMMM" log show UN7MMM as his call: Laurent, F1JKJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00113.html (7,649 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]