Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+checking\s+in\s+CQWW\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Toni Lindén" <oh2ua@oh2u.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:56:07 +0300
I'm surprised! After looking some of CQWW 2007 CW logs, I'm wondering how it is possible to be that good SO2R guy as some of CQWW logs pointed out. As an example, let's look one of European Top 10 en
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00065.html (11,552 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Mike Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:13:01 -0500
I must really hope that posting of peoples logs does not start to happen here. This is the best demonstration that logs might be better not being made public yet. Of course it might be a way to see t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00083.html (7,265 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Matt IZ3EYZ" <iz3eyz@virgilio.it>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 21:05:15 +0200
Hats off to Toni for opening up Pandora's. Besides such an exceptional multi-radio skill example it's amazing to see: -mult hunting capabilities showed by some SOSB entries in high rate conds -SO2R g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00099.html (9,261 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Frugoli" <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 18:01:15 -0400
Why not? Can I post my own log? Can I post a link to someone's log instead of the actual log? I just don't get all the worry about public logs, etc. Isn't there a piece of amateur radio about mentori
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00102.html (9,151 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:35:50 -0400
Just on this list, we had a log posted, with some interesting inferences. Public posting in and of itself is not the problem, it is what some people do with them. I had an entrant who at one stage in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00133.html (10,583 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 18:44:39 +0100
"More people" may be a red herring. CQ already has software that provides every entrant with a detailed UBN report. The same QSO database, together with the corresponding spots data, can be used to i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00134.html (8,310 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 01:30:47 +0300
Mike, this is not about one royal flush. This is about hitting sets or two pairs at every hand through the tournament. You say that don't post here but help organizers. Well, do you think it has not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00135.html (14,836 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:42:19 -0400
Yes Paul, criticism of public logs will continue. And the innocent will be unjustly accused and forced unfairly to defend themselves. The end result? Contesters will begin to wonder if it's worth the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00136.html (9,811 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:08:16 -0800
I am curious why the computer 'guru's' can't solve the log checking delays. When computers first came out, in basic language, computer guru's like K1EA designed logging software and moved the contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00137.html (10,025 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Milt, N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 19:43:45 -0700
Mal and others, IMHO the real reason it is NOT done quickly has nothing to do with the availability of resources; or the resources applied at the right time. IMHO the real reason is so that the resul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00138.html (12,327 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 00:13:51 -0500
What innocent people are being unjustly accused of what? Who are you talking about / defending? Or, is all of this pure speculation without any basis in fact? Bob W5OV Yes Paul, criticism of public l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00139.html (10,642 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:43:59 -0700
Which do you think is more likely to drive away the average, honest contester ... knowing that others will have access to his honest log or knowing that the cheats are going to be protected by a code
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00140.html (8,757 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Cahill" <jcahill@tinet.ie>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:05:45 +0100
Tonno, you obviously have not yet figured out the ground rules. Stations outside the US are only there to provide those necessary QSO's. What do you think would happen if a few stations in the US beg
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00157.html (11,488 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu