Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+submission\s+ok\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+submission\s+ok\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Log submission ok (score: 1): Author: rob <wa1fcn@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:07:14 -0600; GM Randy and All Using my mail server and attaching log cw@cqww.com worked fine and promptly sent me a acknowledgement. Before that I tried using the CQ WW page that has all the " rules records logs; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00382.html (7,350 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log submission ok (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:50:03 -0500; The web page makes additional checks beyond what the email robot does. These can help remove common errors that may cost a few QSOs. Either way, I am happy that you were able to submit your log. Rand; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00384.html (8,468 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log submission ok (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:25:36 -0800; I'll second Randy's encouragement to use the Log Submittal webpage. It is a benefit to the user because (1) it finds more formatting errors than the robot, (2) it reports those errors in a more under; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00000.html (9,464 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]