Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Logging\s+Programs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Logging\s+Programs\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:43:14 -0500; I remember seeing somewhere, a umm like a poll, or something. What it was is a umm report of what programs are being used. in order of popularity. Where did I see this? Joe WB9SBD -- Sig The Original; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00051.html (7,192 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: VE5ZX <ve5zx@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:43:25 -0600; There was a survey on Contesting.com in 2010 http://www.contesting.com/survey/256 Syl - VE5ZX What it was is a umm report of what programs are being used. in order of popularity. Where did I see this; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00054.html (7,279 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>; Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 15:51:25 -0300; This is not a survey but stats extracted from logs sent to CQ for CQ WW DX SSB and CW (2008 through 2012). http://qsl.net/lu5dx/loggers-by-year-mode-pie.html 73. Martin, LU5DX _______________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00069.html (8,198 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 10:29:23 -0500; Now the question is, as i see stuff about contesting, everywhere, web pages, facebook, news items, etc.. especially today with Field Day, And then after the WRTC contest was over most people used N1M; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00238.html (7,705 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: "Peter Dougherty $W2IRT$" <contesting@w2irt.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:05:27 -0400; I don't really see widespread use of N1MM+ by the elite stations, at least in the unscientific survey of a few dozen I observed in articles, etc, from a few years ago. Writelog and Wintest are the tw; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00240.html (9,071 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: Chris Plumblee <chris.plumblee@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:31:57 -0400; Hi Joe, You're probably seeing Win-Test, which looks superficially similar to N3FJP (and, to a greater extent, to CT). Win-Test is the most popular logger in EU, as I understand it. Most Western Euro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00241.html (9,731 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:42:33 -0500 (CDT); Could it be something as simple as more pictures are being submitted (for the write-ups) with 'FJP than 'MM? Could it be that the people putting the write-ups together prefer displaying 'FJP than 'MM; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00242.html (9,098 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:11:03 -0400; WB9SBD asks: This is like asking "If all I see are ads for Fords, then why do none of them look like the cars that win the Indy 500?" I would suggest that contesters using N3FJP's software, spend lit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00243.html (10,153 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:40:29 -0400; Joe, Looking at that chart, it would appear that N1MM owns a huge portion of the contesting software being used. I don't believe that chart is truly representative of either N1MM or N3FJP. I know for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00244.html (9,316 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 18:26:08 -0300; The numbers you see in my web page are taken from the Cabrillo headers of the logs received by CQ for the CQ WW DX Contests (2008-2012). I'll try to include the 2013 and 2014 numbers asap. 73, Martin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00245.html (10,481 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 18:28:44 -0500; Tim that is very interesting information. I have been using Writelog for many years. It works real nice and I don't have to learn a new piece of software. Thanks for the info, Bill W5VX WB9SBD asks:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00247.html (11,584 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: "$K7ZO$ Scott Tuthill" <k7zo@cableone.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:04:18 -0600; * Win-Test -- relatively few users, but with big logs. On average the biggest of any logging program by a wide margin. * N1MM Family -- many users, with average size logs. Of course with 47% of the l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00249.html (9,277 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>; Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:51:36 -0400; If you are a serious contester (meaning you use every feature available to you), you are NOT going to use N3FJP. Great stuff, but for beginners. Different strokes for different folks. As for all the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00252.html (11,084 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: John Bescher via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:36:46 -0400; Over the long run, my bets are on N3FJP. Lots of special events, QSO parties and contests supported, easy to use, bulletproof, easy to pick up for the first time, backups are automatic, Web interface; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00253.html (8,599 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:02:25 -0700 (PDT); I think most of us tend to stick with who brought us to the dance. Back in the 80's My first "real" contest logger was CT. Being a DOS application the workflow was keyboard-centric, and I developed; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00254.html (9,184 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: <aa6dx@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:30:33 -0700; I have been using N3FJP's programs since they started offering them .. used CT in the way-back, and have tried others. Scott & Kimberly do a swell job..highly recommend you give their software a try!; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00255.html (9,339 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: "Pat Whelton" <pwhelton@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 06:37:01 -0500; I have to endorse N3FJP contesting loggers. They have a very short learning curve. They give you a picture of how well you are doing with respect to your own station. Each contest module basically ha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00000.html (8,752 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 06:45:26 -0700; Two years ago, the Field Day group I went out with used N3FJP in a wireless network. There were problems with the network and the server lost a bunch of QSOs. I figured no problem, the missing QSOs w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00001.html (9,060 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]