Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Logging\s+question\s*$/: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 01:12:52 +0300
Fellow contesters, I got a request over email to change two of my recent logs. There was a 2by3 call sign asking me to change my log so he would get my LoTW confirmation for two QSOs. A third QSO was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00028.html (8,049 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:41:08 -0400
Hi Jukka You logged the QSO based on what happened over the air - job done. No point in making changes after the fact, and you certainly did the right thing. I would have done the same. For someone t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00029.html (9,521 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 20:43:50 -0500
I agree with you Jukka, What's in the log, is what stays in the log. OK, back in my hole, Ron, KU7Y Arizona Outlaws Contest Club Northern California Contest Club Silver Springs, NV ku7y@qsl.net my __
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00030.html (8,850 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 21:15:33 -0400
What were the changes he requested? 73, Ken, AB1J In a message dated 2015-08-04 12:20:16 A.M. Coordinated Universal Ti, jpklemola@gmail.com writes: Fellow contesters, I got a request over email to ch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00031.html (9,261 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 21:23:56 -0400
Jukka, Not having seen the text of the original emails exchanged, it is impossible to know if you did or didn't say something wrong. That said... You logged what you copied. - If you didn't copy the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00032.html (10,678 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:51:21 -0600
Important information is missing. That is how many letters were incorrect in your log? If one letter was incorrect (one off as some would say) then I would correct it in my log. If it is more than on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00033.html (9,522 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:31:12 +0300
Hi Ken, He simply asked me to correct his call in my log so he would get a confirmation on LoTW. 73, Jukka OH6LI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00034.html (9,346 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:37:03 -0700
The questions I would ask are, "did you make the QSOs," "what did he ask you to change?" If it were me and I DID make the QSOs but there's something about the way they were logged incorrectly, either
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00035.html (10,291 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:07:32 +0300
Jukka, I think this happens to us all, both after contests and after normal contacts. I never heard any bad words about my principles of not changing any calls or times or frequencies in order to mak
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00036.html (13,384 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 08:24:59 -0500
If I wasn't entirely sure it wasn't my error, I might be inclined to change the log (though not until after my final submission to the contest). But, the moron lost all hope by firing back insults. H
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00037.html (11,193 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 08:37:28 -0500
I am not sure how close his callsign was to the one you logged, but logging mistakes are common. You could check QRZ.com to see if your logged call is active or valid. What is strange is that that he
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00038.html (10,341 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Mark van Wijk, PA5MW" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 15:50:51 +0200
One missing letter in the log... Happened to me too, more than once, especially because there's one fine DX'er which has one digit less than my call. What did I do? I just smiled at the idea of a pos
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00039.html (9,087 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 11:30:18 -0500
Almost 20 years ago, a guy I worked with, an MIT grad, told me that his teen-aged daughter sent e-mails to friends and then called them on the telephone to see if the e-mail got through. K1TN/4 _____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00040.html (7,789 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:44:01 -0400
This is an interesting question. To me - there is a difference between contest log - it is what it is. Contest is over. And the log for DXCC and WAS or County purposes. For those purposes, I will loo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00041.html (8,940 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:13:26 -0500
How does he know you worked him those two times and you got his call wrong? Your OH6LI call sign is not registered on eQSL. Maybe you were using a contest call that is registered on eQSL? Otherwise,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00042.html (11,440 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 00:01:51 +0700
This matter relates to the constant problem I have, as a little pistol, in calling the rapid professional contest ops. Often they copy my call wrong, I send correction, and then instead of replying w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00043.html (11,090 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:42:57 -0400
That's one of the reasons why I keep audio records of all of my contests. In such a situation, including when I receive a QSL card ''not in my log'' I listen to what happened. Then I can take a clear
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00044.html (10,097 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:52:06 +0300
My QSO confirmation priority is LoTW. I do not really know what the 2by3 call sign's information source was. I think his information source is his own log. My view is all QSOs are equal. QSO either w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00045.html (12,837 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:19:16 -0300
Jukka, You did the right thing. Even in the days before LOTW, nearly any time I went to a rare VHF grid, (IOTA) Island or DXCC I would get requests for QSL's, sometimes with notes saying that I copie
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00046.html (9,099 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Brett Graham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 22:14:21 +0000
If I receive a request for QSL in the post & find I busted the other station's call in my log, I review my recordings, UBN report & then make judgment call - more often than not, I did fumble & will
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00048.html (9,233 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu