Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Logging\s+question\s*$/: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 11:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
Meanwhile all of my cards to Jim (dozens over the years) remain unanswered, even though I use LoTW as per his requirements.  Sigh. 73, de KØHB Sent from my Heathkit H89 ______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00079.html (11,282 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 14:28:48 -0600
I can't believe what I am reading from Jim. So Jim if I receive another QSL card request from you (I am not on LoTW) with a SAE and return funds; would you like me to throw it in the trash and keep t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00080.html (10,448 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 15:43:40 -0500
Jim you get things right most of the time but I am amazed that you say that the bureau system is broke. I use it monthly! And I find it to be a really nice adjunct to LOTW. My process for QSLing is t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00083.html (13,237 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Eric Rosenberg <ericrosenberg.dc@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 22:58:17 -0400
With all due respect to K9YC, my experience as an incoming QSL bureau sorter tells a somewhat different story. During the three years I've been a sorter, almost 400 "3Q" have received cards. The aver
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00084.html (11,829 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 07:53:22 -0700
is LOTW like a cell phone? I don't have one of those either. i have updated my commodore 64. Isn't that enough? mike w7dra ____________________________________________________________ Old School Year
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00087.html (11,117 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 10:25:49 -0400
I, too, am a sorter with the 2nd district incoming bureau. I sort the letter "O" and there's one world-class DXpedition QSLer I sort many pounds of cards per month for, in addition to about 30 or so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00088.html (13,375 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Mike Reublin NF4L <nf4l@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 11:36:00 -0400
Dr. DX rules on the '64. 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00089.html (8,181 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 19:30:05 -0700
Do what you like with it. You know my policy. I have adopted it for the reasons stated. :) Some complain that LOTW doesn't work for most awards other than ARRL awards. It COULD, if those administerin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00093.html (11,568 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:15:06 -0700
You sent me a stack of cards to prove some point that I've forgotten, and I ignored them. 73, Jim _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00094.html (9,783 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:14:56 -0700
On Sat,8/8/2015 9:24 AM, Oliver Dröse wrote: To my mind it's plain theft, sri. I've done quite a number of projects myself, published in magazines and on the web, etc. I do this for my own pleasure (
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00095.html (14,204 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 07:29:19 -0700
Until about three years ago, I responded to all these stations, sending I probably get as many buro cards as Jim. I use and recommend http://www.globalqsl.com/ . For about ten cents per card, Global
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00099.html (10,835 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:28:16 +0200
Am 10.08.2015 um 04:30 schrieb Jim Brown: If RSGB or DARC put up a system like LOTW, I would happily upload my log to it. Or, even better, encourage ARRL to coordinate theirs with LOTW. Well, DARC's
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00106.html (10,000 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:00:21 +1000
While we are promoting awards programmes ; The Wireless Institute of Australia has it's own equivalent http://www.wia.org.au/members/awards/about/ It has an active updated DXCC Standings table online
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00107.html (11,131 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: vk3sx <vk3sx@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:14:43 +1000
Thanks Trent Well put into words.  Bob VK3SX Wia Awards Manager Utopia Rocks Sent from Samsung Mobile -- Original message -- From: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com> Date: To: cq-contest@contesting.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00108.html (10,340 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu