- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Looking for possibly busted calls (score: 1)
- Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 23:56:00 -0000
- J3YBB is probably JA3YBB. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00031.html (8,014 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Looking for possibly busted calls (score: 1)
- Author: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@adelphia.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:27:13 -0000
- I have no JA3YBB QSOs in my log, but I have 29 JJ3YBB QSOs... Stu KC1F QSL _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00032.html (9,267 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Looking for possibly busted calls (score: 1)
- Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:59:36 -0500
- Was doing it from memory and couldn't remember if it was JA3YBB or JJ3YBB. I will admit that the latter did seem to seem more right to me at the time, but the JA3 seemed like a more used prefix. I ha
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00040.html (10,409 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu