Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LotW\s+Support\s+by\s+ARRL\s+Officials\s+\&\s+Officers\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW Support by ARRL Officials & Officers (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:15:50 -0800
I suspect that a sizeable portion of ARRL Officialdom is occupied doing other things than operating and enjoying ham radio. Just ask your Director and Vice Director how much time they have for actua
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00479.html (7,572 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW Support by ARRL Officials & Officers (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:49:55 -0000
Ward this is one of the few times we are in total disagreement: Looking at this from a business point of view, never loose site of the fact the ARRL is a business, the employees and management need t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00486.html (10,092 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW Support by ARRL Officials & Officers (score: 1)
Author: N6HC@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:50:16 EST
I suspect that a sizeable portion of ARRL Officialdom is occupied doing other things than operating and enjoying ham radio. Just ask your Director and Vice Director how much time they have for actual
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00493.html (8,358 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW Support by ARRL Officials & Officers (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:22:23 -0800
Addressing the case of the Directors and Vice Directors listed in the original post - I believe that by volunteering countless hours on behalf of their divisions in particular and amateur radio in ge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00495.html (11,224 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW Support by ARRL Officials & Officers (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:04:30 -0500
I dunno, Mal. I know what you are saying, but it would seem that by following the logic, the officials would have to participate in every one of the ARRL sponsored activities, lest they aren't suppor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00506.html (8,670 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW Support by ARRL Officials & Officers (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Putnam" <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 06:38:27 -0700
Understanding the need for WAS, and realizing that after a few years of using my radio, developing antennas, and answering the qsl requests after verifiying each of them as being in my log, and havin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00509.html (16,071 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW Support by ARRL Officials & Officers (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - W5OV" <W5OV@W5OV.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:09:58 -0600
Ward, this is one of those many times we are in total agreement. (Surprising? - No.) However, Terry (AB5K) has made a valid observation that is sadly nothing new. It is quite apparent that the ARRL i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00511.html (12,868 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW Support by ARRL Officials & Officers (score: 1)
Author: Lee Hiers <lee.hiers@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:40:16 -0500
Whether ARRL elected officials or staff use LOTW is related to contesting (and appropriate for discussion here) how? -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA "Have Dobro Will Travel" _____________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00519.html (8,151 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW Support by ARRL Officials & Officers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:39:17 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Because many people operate contests in order to get QSL cards, not necessarily for the competition. The fact that many of the ARRL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00530.html (9,016 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu