Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+M\/S\s+band\s+change\s+rule\s+in\s+ARRL\s+DX\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] M/S band change rule in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:45:22 +0200
Hi, I haven't done Multi Op in ARRL for some time thus looked at the rules today after a while. It was surpise for me that only 6 band changes are allowed for M/S. And there is no word about the seco
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00347.html (8,457 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] M/S band change rule in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Gilmer - N2MG" <n2mg@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 05:10:50 -0800 (PST)
Yes, that's it. It used to be a ten-minute band-change rule, but I like the 6-changes-per-hour rule better. The "second" and any other radios are good as back-ups and for filling the bandmap. Not lik
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00348.html (9,174 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] M/S band change rule in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 07:00:47 -0600
That's why there's a multi-2 category. -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/ --
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00349.html (10,239 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] M/S band change rule in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:15:41 -0500
General HF Rules: 2.3.1. Multioperator, Single Transmitter: Stations are allowed only one transmitted signal at any given time. Yes, different than CQWW -- The world's top contesters battle it out in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00350.html (8,739 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] M/S band change rule in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Idelson <k1ir@designet.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:36:37 -0500
Tonno, M/S and M/2 are great categories in DX contesting. They both require even more strategic thinking and teamwork than single-op and multi-multi. You do understand the rule correctly. But, you ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00351.html (9,782 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] M/S band change rule in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:21:59 +0200
thanks guys for many prompt answers! ES5Q will be M/2! More fun for us and you;) Cu on bands! 73 tonno es5tv today multpliers transmitted signal at any given time. -- The world's top contesters battl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00353.html (9,347 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] M/S band change rule in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: Rick Tavan <tavan@tibco.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:48:40 -0800
M/S band change restrictions such as ARRL's create a lame category in which the scoring potential for multiple operators in a given time span is lower than the scoring potential for one operator. Thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00380.html (9,886 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] M/S band change rule in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:38:03 -0500
Rick, I agree with you that the NCCC M/S rule makes more sense and is a little more practical, IMHO, than the current ARRL M/S rule. It's too late to do anything about it for this contest season, wit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00381.html (10,717 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] M/S band change rule in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:19:00 -0600
One of the great things about he ARRL contest is that this has a M/S category that can be truly called a Multi-op Single transmitter category. The limit on band changes makes it possible to do well i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00384.html (10,038 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] M/S band change rule in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 06:36:00 -0600
When trying to work multi-single in the ARRL test a few years ago, I realized how frustrating this is since even though I was the only person operating at the time, I could not utlize the capabilitie
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00389.html (9,933 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu