Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+MO2R\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+MO2R\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] MO2R? (score: 1): Author: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:52:52 -0800 (PST); It's merely adapting M/M technology to a M/S effort. We ran "MO2R" (I guess you could call it that) for years at W4PA/K4JNY for M/S on the run band. Two interlocked rigs with a commutator device I b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00348.html (8,357 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] MO2R? (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:37:35 +0500; What Scott describes below is almost exactly and in full realized in the hardware of Expert-1kW Italian transistor amplifier http://www.radio-ham.eu/Expert1K-FA.htm The only difference is that Rig#2; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00350.html (9,730 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] MO2R? (score: 1): Author: "ku8e" <ku8e@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:16:42 -0500; Isn't MO2R either Multi-Single or Multi-2 ? If you work everyone on your 2nd radio you are classified as M2X. If you only work multipliers on your 2nd radio and obey the 10 minute rule you are classi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00355.html (6,970 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]