Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Michigan\,\s+South\s+Dakota\,\s+and\s+Ontario\s+QSO\s+Parties\s+This\s+Weekend\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Michigan\,\s+South\s+Dakota\,\s+and\s+Ontario\s+QSO\s+Parties\s+This\s+Weekend\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Michigan, South Dakota, and Ontario QSO Parties This Weekend (score: 1): Author: Chuck-NO5W <no5w@consolidated.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:53:11 -0500; Following up on the notes from K0PC and VE3GTC its interesting to note that there are three QSO parties scheduled for this weekend: Michigan, South Dakota, and Ontario. Maps on the MI QP website, and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00259.html (7,560 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Michigan, South Dakota, and Ontario QSO Parties This Weekend (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:33:47 +0100; It seems to me that, when QSO parties overlap, each would get more entries if there was a common QSO format, and unique county/state identifiers. Logging, and log submission, would be simplified - ju; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00262.html (7,624 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]