Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Missing\s+the\s+point\s+on\s+SS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Missing\s+the\s+point\s+on\s+SS\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Missing the point on SS (score: 1): Author: Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 19:01:57 -0500; People who think that QSOs once-per-band is the right way to "fix" SS are missing the point. K9MA has made it clearly: the only-once format gives smaller stations (myself) a chance to be not so far b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00145.html (7,687 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Missing the point on SS (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 21:47:32 -0500; My take on it is this: Each contest has some unique aspects to it. Be it one QSO per contest (SS), everyone runs low power (NAQP), different exchanges, etc. These different aspects make each contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00150.html (9,619 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]