Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+More\s+CQWW\s+anomalies\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+More\s+CQWW\s+anomalies\.\.\.\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] More CQWW anomalies... (score: 1): Author: Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:09:00 -0400 (GMT-04:00); I was QRV in 2007 CQWW SSB as FM/K9NW. Open logs are a wonderful thing as I was able to look up all the NILs in my UBN/NIL report. My NIL report showed my log getting dinged for the following: - A fe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00109.html (7,880 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW anomalies... (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:30:54 +0000; One that really bothers me is a NIL from an N7 I worked for a zone mult. IMO, any W/VE that shows a pattern of not logging zero pointers should be disqualified for unsportsmanlike conduct. Barry W2UP; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00114.html (8,837 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW anomalies... (score: 1): Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:27:46 +0200; Yuri VE3DZ a écrit : No ! (i worked DK1F and didn't get a NIL) Only the CALLSIGN header field is taken into account by the robot. - If we have DL9LR in all QSO lines, but DK1F in the header, those wh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00115.html (7,641 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW anomalies... (score: 1): Author: Teijo Murtovaara <teijo.murtovaara@netikka.fi>; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:59:31 +0300; Laurent Ferracci kirjoitti: Same here, DK1F was ok for me also, but I was also dinged for incorrect call with UN7MMM. Another anomaly that I found was YO5OHY. His log had incorrect date for the first; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00131.html (8,800 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW anomalies... (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:12:21 -0700; You would think that most op's know when an realy active contester calls them, it is usually for a new mult or zone. We need a new Q signal for "Thanks-ur a new mult" :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _______________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00138.html (7,747 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]