I know what you are saying Randy and I respectably disagree that this is really needed. I don't think that reducing the hours of a contest will do much to balance the competition level of that contes
The only thing that has made me really angry in contesting was the decision to go from 30 to 36 hours in WPX. It was a change which was lobbied for by a tiny minority of contesters who already had an
Come on train!!!! Which entity out there is brave enough to do it? de Milt, N5IA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contest
Having read many great posts about WPX from guys like KQ2M, KL7RA K5NA and now VK7GN, I must say I am simply in awe. I haven't operated a WPX contest since the late 70's. My trip to 6Y1V next week wi
I've been doing the WPX seriously for about 4 years now. I'm not sure I had a dog in this fight until now. With a 60 foot crankup tower with a tribander and a few wires, I've managed to get into the
Hard data is going to be hard to come by. The change from 30 hours to 36 hours was made before the change that awarded 1 point for intra-country QSO's. Thus, it's going to be hard to compare. 73, Ste
As long as we are shortening by 6 hours, why not another 6? At 24 hours, those that want to shorten the contest are even happier. For those that wish the contest was 48 hours, they can operate in two
yes, indeed:) This seems to be a rather small issue and the probability of it being changed is also very small but still, seeing how you fight over this and other issues hot here I am sort of happy t
I would never travel to PJ2 to operate only 24 or 30 hours ... 73, Timo OH1NOA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contestin