Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Multi\-Single\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Multi\-Single\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] multi-single (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Sat Feb 3 17:19:13 2001; How to multi-single....well, here are my thoughts having done a few: First off this is the ARRL Contest coming up so CAREFULLY read ARRL's = rules regarding multi-single, they are WAY WAY WAY differe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00016.html (11,515 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] multi-single (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Sat Feb 3 21:19:53 2001; OK OK - yeah, six per hour is not 10 minutes minimum but... ...with packet assistance, it certainly is possible to have a LOT of bands available to you for mults and the limitation to six per hour wh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00019.html (8,976 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] multi-single (score: 1): Author: k8cc@mediaone.net (k8cc); Date: Sat Feb 3 15:54:01 2001; Jim, This is not correct. The "six bandchanges per clock hour" REPLACED the ten-minute rule. Eliminating the "stuck on a band for ten minutes" was the whole point of changing the rules. FWIW, I think; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00021.html (11,519 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: k3md@penn.com (John W. Thompson MD); Date: Sat Dec 6 06:54:54 1997; I know this has been discussed ad nauseam, but a number of my friends have asked me to say my opinion. 1. Multi-Single in the CQWW was probably NEVER meant for 15 ops all monitoring rigs just to find; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00110.html (8,149 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: k0hb@juno.com (Hans Brakob); Date: Sat Dec 6 23:37:44 1997; On Sat, 06 Dec 1997 06:54:54 -0500 "John W. Thompson MD" <k3md@penn.com> writes: With all due respect to your friends, I must characterize the above statement as an ill-conceived and dangerous idea.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00119.html (8,618 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon); Date: Sun Dec 7 00:10:46 1997; For CQWW and ARRL DX, there should be NO SINGLE OP unassisted class, This is also my class in the contests. As for packet or internet access, I have all the equiptment fro Pcket except a decent comp; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00121.html (9,509 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: dnorris@k7no.com (Dean Norris); Date: Sat Dec 6 17:19:41 1997; Hi Hans and others, I am sysop of a cluster and noticed that at least one contester that enters as single op/unassisted was connected to the cluster for the full period of the contest. Suggestions? c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00122.html (9,323 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (Doug KR2Q); Date: Sat Dec 6 19:20:26 1997; << here should be NO SINGLE OP unassisted class, there is too much cheating going on. >> DISCLAIMER: The following comments are MY OWN opinions and are NOT intended to be taken as being representativ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00123.html (9,462 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: k0hb@juno.com (Hans Brakob); Date: Sun Dec 7 01:27:39 1997; *Being connected* to the cluster is not necessarily cheating. *Using the spots* (and claiming "unassisted") is cheating. For example, CT will allow a single op to be connected and even post spots, bu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00124.html (9,540 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: bsimonson@home.com (Beryl D. Simonson); Date: Sat Dec 6 21:32:00 1997; Let's be sure to keep the facts and contest rules straight. These comments do not convey an understanding of the software and the contest rules. CT (and I assume most of the other contest software) a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00125.html (10,335 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: k0hb@juno.com (Hans Brakob); Date: Sun Dec 7 03:56:09 1997; *Being connected* to the cluster is not necessarily cheating. *Using the spots* (and claiming "unassisted") is cheating. For example, CT will allow a single op to be connected and even post spots, bu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00126.html (9,938 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough); Date: Sun Dec 7 07:49:42 1997; Yep, and we should eliminate the various power categories too. Too many guys claiming low power who are running amplifiers. That's easy to say when you operate from a country that has a digital tele; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00133.html (10,887 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon); Date: Sun Dec 7 23:06:01 1997; class, HI all. Boy it is going to get harder and harder to contest for me with all the classes ya'll want to delete. No single op unassisted No low power!!! You mean I'm going to have to go head to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00135.html (9,008 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: dnorris@k7no.com (Dean Norris); Date: Sun Dec 7 16:05:22 1997; Please understand that I am NOT accusing anyone of anything. As Hans and many others have pointed out, CT and other programs allow one to be unassisted while also allowing one to post to a cluster. M; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00136.html (11,275 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: w6go@quiknet.com (Jay O'Brien); Date: Sun Dec 7 16:41:29 1997; Dean, Even if you can PROVE that people were cheating, if it is an ARRL contest, the ARRL Contest desk is likely to completely ignore your input no matter how well documented. After one SS contest wh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00139.html (8,885 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: rbowen@iglobal.net (Ralph Bowen); Date: Mon Dec 8 01:33:12 1997; Yep - when I started contesting in 1970, ARRL SS & DX contests had a low power category. Except for a few isolated cases, the only categories in other contests were single band or all band, m/s or m/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00140.html (9,040 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: W2CE@prodigy.net (W2CE); Date: Mon Dec 8 10:07:23 1997; You have to realize that there are people who attain some form of position be it an officer of a large radio club or even ARRL position that are experiencing the biggest influential position of thei; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00156.html (9,291 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: ku7y@sage.dri.edu (Monte Stark); Date: Mon Dec 8 07:36:50 1997; Hi Jay, They give their OO program the same treatment. They will have nothing to do with taking a position that they might have to defend! 73, Ron, SOWP 5545M, .........KU7Y.....ARCI #8829.....Monte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00162.html (8,435 bytes)
19. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: beaton@wintermute.co.uk (Alastair Beaton); Date: Tue Dec 9 16:21:40 1997; Thanks to those in this strand for letting us know that a few people cheat in contests. I'm sure none of the other subscribers to this reflector ever imagined such things could happen in amateur radi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00187.html (7,642 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single (score: 1): Author: k3md@penn.com (John W. Thompson MD); Date: Sat Dec 6 06:54:54 1997; I know this has been discussed ad nauseam, but a number of my friends have asked me to say my opinion. 1. Multi-Single in the CQWW was probably NEVER meant for 15 ops all monitoring rigs just to find; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00522.html (8,243 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]