Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+N6TJ\s+AXIOMS\s+OF\s+LIFE\s*$/: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:57:06 -0700
Hi Barry: Well, you might think that Cluster spots have increased my QSO rate significantly. Sadly, the opposite appears to be true. Example: W2UP spots ZD8Z on 14035. Suddenly a few hundred have hit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00312.html (14,969 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:19:43 -0600
Yes Paul you are so correct. Amateur radio contesting is becoming internet contesting and amateur radio DXing is becoming internet DXing. Jim, N6TJ, advice to the children falls on deaf ears as the P
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00313.html (8,727 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@k8nd.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:28:27 -0400
I invite all competitors of PJ2T to post spots of our call frequently in an effort to REDUCE our score. Over and over again! Send your friends to spot us! Please! ;-) There are only a few hours in a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00315.html (8,966 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:28:43 +0200
EI5DI wrote: My hobby is amateur radio contesting. Yours is something else - I suggest internet contesting. ITU definition: A radiocommunication service for the purpose of self-training, intercommuni
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00316.html (9,433 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Mackanos" <Paul@PaulMackanos.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:07:41 -0400
That's the way it is, a fact of life, all you have to do is: Deal with it the best way you can, and above all else: "have FUN, remember, it is only a hobby !!!!!!!" 73 de Paul K2DB __________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00317.html (9,294 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:19:44 -0400
I think the issue of spotting negatively affects only a small proportion of operators - namely those who are single ops operating from locations where they are the the only or perhaps one of two oper
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00318.html (10,219 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Mackanos" <Paul@PaulMackanos.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:32:20 -0400
Here is the problem that I see from your end, and there are no flames intended. The first thing I will comment about is the BIG USA multi-op stations kept calling, completely ignoring what I was send
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00320.html (14,112 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:14:33 -0800
Paul said: "" Once amateur radio contesting becomes indistinguishable from or inseparable from the internet, it will have ceased to be amateur radio "" N7MAL said, earlier this year on another list:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00321.html (12,191 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:21:29 +0200
I strongly disagree. Spotting affects contest operating in general and it is adding to the dumbing down of amateur radio. Building up an "impressive" score that is dependant on DX-cluster spots has n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00322.html (8,854 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <Tonno.Vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:51:21 +0000
We might debate for ever what is exactly anyone wants from amateur radio and which trends are making it more attractive and popular and which are dumbing down. But this is Contest reflector and what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00325.html (11,820 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:41:24 -0800
Paul you said: "" 90% of your whole problem would have been averted if you had simply ID'd after every QSO. "" I couldn't agree more. Far be it from me to question N6TJ, or other 'big-guns'. Jim has
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00326.html (15,022 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:17:59 -0700
Oh to be young again. I should know better, but Tonno, I have no clue as to your age or as to when you started this seriously. Having spread my "competitive from DX" over the past 43 years, let me as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00328.html (14,895 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:41:45 -0600
Paul, I disagree. Some of the big USA multiops have excellent operators. Some have mediocre and poor operators. Some jump on a new packet spot as soon as it hits their screen and throw in their call
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00329.html (15,949 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:09:18 -0400
I'm not a fan of spotting, and think that a lot of hams do rely on packet too much. I don't. When I operate assisted, the spots are there to supplement my runs - and my runs encompass 95% of my QSOs.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00330.html (11,429 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 22:11:59 -0700
Disclaimer: I almost never operate assisted (in any manner) during a contest. That being said, it beats the heck out of me why so many people seem to think that change is inherently bad, and that any
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00331.html (13,750 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:15:21 +0200
N6TJ wrote: Oh to be young again. I should know better, but Tonno, I have no clue as to your age or as to when you started this seriously. Jim, with all due respect, you should know better! I am sure
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00332.html (8,775 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:58:13 +0100
This statement from Tõnno ES5TV raises a few questions - Why, in spite of the "huge contribution" due to spotting, is it still not permitted for WRTC operators? Do you accept that if you (ES5TV/ES2RR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00334.html (9,346 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <Tonno.Vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:41:00 +0000
I think you understand that by huge contribution I mean the increased rate and interest for casual ops. That has nothing to do with allowing WRTC ops to use packet. As far as we believe that un-assi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00340.html (12,192 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:23:16 -0500
OK, next time I hear you I'll spot you 20 kHz higher than your real frequency. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00341.html (8,848 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:17:01 -0400
I usually run unassisted S&P, but sometimes P&S. My station is small enough that running, except maybe in a QSO party is a dream - something about short, low wires, and a small enough lot (that is la
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00343.html (9,637 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu