Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NA\s+February\s+Sprint\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NA\s+February\s+Sprint\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: "Ted Bryant" <W4NZ@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:20:20 -0500; On the 3830 reflector, Andy N2NT asked: "...Anyone for moving the Feb sprint an hour earlier or to 160m? Well, at least till the spots come back..." Interesting ideas, Andy. In the Northern Californi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00124.html (10,038 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: Bill Haddon <haddon.bill@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:14:34 -0800; Ted, W4NZ Wrote to Cq-Contest: hmmm . .actually we just wanted to give out another bottle of wine :-) But it's hit a snag .. some guy called W4NZ won the East div competition in '08, and TN is on of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00127.html (9,975 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:23:23 +0000; Even more interesting would be a break down of stations North versus South. East/West is much less significant when it comes to propagation. On the 3830 reflector, Andy N2NT asked: "...Anyone for mov; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00128.html (9,668 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:21:39 -0500; Bravo, Ted! Succinctly stated, good data, asking the right questions. I favor a test of moving the February Sprint an hour earlier, but keeping the bands as is. Reasoning, chiefly, is that it's a min; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00129.html (12,422 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:00:11 -0700; No doubt, 20 meters really stunk for everyone last weekend. However, a one time anomaly is not a good reason to change what has worked well for the past 25 years. If you question whether this last Sp; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00131.html (13,362 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:32:18 -0500; Spoken like a westerner, Steve. 'Ted's data covered 5 years, not just this year - most of the whole downslope of this sunspot cycle. I think they're pretty persuasive. 73, Pete N4ZR _________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00134.html (14,494 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:50:36 -0700; No need to make any changes because we are at the bottom of a cycle that does not want to go up, where conditions on a single band were poor on that day. Look what KA9FOX did QRP with the great 40 an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00136.html (15,071 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:02:35 -0700; Okay, Pete. I'll swap. Change the WPX back to 30 hours maximum for single-ops, and the Sprint can be changed to start at 23Z. That will allow the westerner's to be more competitive in WPX, like they; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00137.html (16,213 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:11:06 -0700; You're almost on the right track, Mike. Look at how the number of east coast entries in the Sprint has gone down compared to west coast entries in the last 20-25 years. The east coast was much more c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00138.html (8,945 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: rt_clay@bellsouth.net; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:11:54 +0000; Yes, conditions were better in Feb 2008 than Feb 2009, but try comparing the number of 20m qso's for the top scoring western and eastern stations. Not even close. If you go back a little further it d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00139.html (16,824 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:40:14 +0000; "Having lots of people on close to you gives you a bunch of loud easy contacts on 80m and 40 as well. " The problem with that argument is that to be competitive you have to work everyone on three ban; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00142.html (8,357 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:50:23 -0700; "But it is not at all an anomaly that 20m closes near sunset at solar minimum. The typical sunset times in Feb are such that the sun has already set for the midwest and east coast at 0000z. Moving th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00143.html (9,556 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA February Sprint (score: 1): Author: Dean Wood <cqden6de@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:35:58 -0800; We in the NCCC were very pleased to field 35 operators on 4 teams in last weekend's CW Sprint. In addition to this, 5 other NCCC members, who were not on a team, participated when they saw their sche; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00180.html (10,493 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]