Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NA\s+SPRINT\s+CW\s+Issues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NA\s+SPRINT\s+CW\s+Issues\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA SPRINT CW Issues (score: 1): Author: "K6VVA - Rick" <cqtest97@k6vva.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 12:01:11 -0800; idea Whether we will be stuck in a real 'Maunder Minimum' or a derivation thereof, I second N2IC's 3830 post comment. The horrific Digital/RTTY conflict issue on 40m still needs to be eliminated fro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00051.html (6,753 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA SPRINT CW Issues (score: 1): Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 18:28:52 -0500; Might help to move to 2300Z start time, but 40 was LOOONNNGGGG at 2300Z. I lost Minnesota stations in the MNQP from SW Michigan well before that, and had to switch to 80 metres for the final hour to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00061.html (8,027 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA SPRINT CW Issues (score: 1): Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com; Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:02:18 +0000; Imagine what it looks like from our (MN) end Hank. We lose 20 meters 3 hours before Sprint even starts and 40 meters an hour before it starts. However I don't see any way to move times around that wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00078.html (9,068 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA SPRINT CW Issues (score: 1): Author: Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:27:40 -0500 (GMT-05:00); The end of the world was predicted with the rare conflict of ARRL RTTY Roundup and NAQP CW earlier this year. It didn't happen that way but within the discussion someone noted the mostly open territ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00079.html (8,586 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA SPRINT CW Issues (score: 1): Author: Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:05:30 -0500; During this discussion K0SR said "However I don't see any way to move times around that won't have a negative impact on somebody." I've got no input, but I just have to thank and praise the person wh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00080.html (7,764 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA SPRINT CW Issues (score: 1): Author: "Ted Bryant" <W4NZ@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:32:45 -0500; Hi Mike, I like your suggestion. The frequencies between 7100-7125kHz seem to be one of the least-used segments on that band. But I would take it one step further - make that segment the suggested 40; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00081.html (9,638 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA SPRINT CW Issues (score: 1): Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:11:38 -0800; Interesting discussion, but I really wonder why no one has asked the obvious question - Is there some belief that all contesters have Extra class licenses? Or perhaps the proponents of this idea wish; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00089.html (11,064 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA SPRINT CW Issues (score: 1): Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:08:38 -0800; Sorry guys, my QLF. No matter how many times I read it, my eyes saw 7100-7125, but my mind read it as 7000-7025. It's a good suggestion... Somehow I have to be able to blame this on Locust / K6VVA...; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00090.html (12,490 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]