- 1. [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint SSB Activity? (score: 1)
- Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:24:20 -0400
- That sure was a pretty bad SSB Sprint! I think I ran out of stations to work about 45 minutes in. Not even SO2R helped in finding QSO's. Had to resort to begging for contacts. Ended up quitting for a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00118.html (7,433 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint SSB Activity? (score: 1)
- Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:16:03 -0700
- I was one of the former regulars who didn't participate in this SSB Sprint. The reason is that I have found the last two hours of the past few SSB Sprints torture due to limited activity. It seems li
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00123.html (7,962 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint SSB Activity? (score: 1)
- Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:16:45 -0400
- I agree that activity has hit an all time low. I've been doing Sprint since the 80s and unless you got over 300 Qs you lost and might not even make top 5. In the Sprint last Saturday I had a malfunct
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00124.html (9,204 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint SSB Activity? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:46:43 -0700
- The Manager of the SSB Sprint is a member of our club. I saw him at the NCCC meeting last week, when he talked for 45 minutes about CQP (of which he is also the Chair), but said not a word about SSB
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00126.html (10,943 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint SSB Activity? (score: 1)
- Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:15:13 -0400
- Something I would suggest considering: Rather that place the SSB Sprint on a fixed calendar date (second Saturdays of February and September), run it on weekends that by virtue of calendar oddities d
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00132.html (10,755 bytes)
- 6. [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint SSB Activity? (score: 1)
- Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:15:39 -0500
- I don't think this is a matter of encouragement or publicity. Hundreds of ops participate in the CW Sprint and they surely are aware of the SSB Sprint, but only a few of them choose to participate in
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00134.html (8,575 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint SSB Activity? (score: 1)
- Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:20:45 -0400
- This was the first SSB Sprint where I made more than 1 QSO but I was still very part time just dabbling a little throughout the evening. I thought it was fun and enjoyed the quick chat with many of t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00136.html (8,656 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint SSB Activity? (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:51:41 -0400
- "Maybe the malaise isn't the Sprint itself, but the lack of leadership in the contest clubs? I've been one of the first (sometimes THE first) in a contest club in which I'm a member, to ask "Is anyon
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00155.html (9,320 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint SSB Activity? (score: 1)
- Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:49:50 -0400
- Shucky durn, I never cease to be amazed at what I can do with my "mighty 5 watts" to an antenna "Proven to be a few dB better than a dummy load buried 6' underground." This antenna is 28 to 40 feet h
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00166.html (12,325 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu