Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+\-\s+High\-power\s+operations\s+in\s+a\s+low\-power\s+contest\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:00:23 -0400
From the 3830 Scores list summary: All Single Op HP WJ9B 769 187 10 143,803 FCG NF3R(K3ASK) 218 96 20,928 Pasadena Contest Clu The rules do say "Output power must be limited to 100 watts for eligible
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00213.html (7,518 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:05:33 -0400
my guess is that when filling out the webform, the default is HP if not declared. -Steve, WM3O _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00227.html (7,980 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest? (score: 1)
Author: "Greg Richard" <k4no@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:47:48 -0500
I hope it was a mistake filling out the form and not a trend. The NAQP is one of the best contest we have for getting new blood into contesting. I'd hate to see a bunch of high power guys enter this
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00233.html (9,431 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest? (score: 1)
Author: <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:34:23 -0400
You really need to experience 10 and 15 meters from here to understand how funny that is. On all of your other points I agree completely. NAQP is a fun contest. 73 Steve K0SR ________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00235.html (7,961 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest? (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Horn <bhorn@hornucopia.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:00:16 -0700
There is no default value for power on the 3830 web forms. However, that doesn't mean that HP wasn't erroneously selected. NAQP logs submitted with high power indicated in the Cabrillo log are treate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00236.html (8,395 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest? (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:16:54 -0500
Maybe it's just a matter of interpretation 100 watts IS high power in NAQP. Are people really/actually penalized or relegated to Check-log status if the indicate HP in NAQP? 73, Dale, kg5u _________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00251.html (8,359 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:44:51 -0700
When using N1MM Logger, the default is HP on the setup. I keep forgetting to change it when starting a new contest. Maybe the HP guys are using N1MM and didn't change the default. 73 Tom W7WHY' _____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00253.html (8,688 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP - High-power operations in a low-power contest? (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:57:22 -0500
Even though it's too late to say this: Please disregard my above posting. I read the rules to refresh myself AFTER sending it. Submitting a log with HIGH as the category nets an automatic categoriza
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00254.html (8,875 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu