Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+vs\s+ARRL\s+RTTY\s+Roundup\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+vs\s+ARRL\s+RTTY\s+Roundup\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] NAQP vs ARRL RTTY Roundup (score: 1): Author: "Bryon PAUL Veal n0ah" <bryonveal@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:35:15 -0700; Walking on egg shells here but.......I think the ARRL should have kept the "volunteer band plan allocations" on their most recent US Amateur Radio Bands published and passed out dated 3/26/2007. To a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00063.html (8,174 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP vs ARRL RTTY Roundup (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:07:11 -0800 (PST); http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Hambands_color.pdf May 6, 2008. Julius Fazekas N2WN Tennessee Contest Group http://k4tcg.org/ http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en Tennessee QSO Party http://www.t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00066.html (9,529 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] NAQP vs ARRL RTTY Roundup (score: 1): Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:38:59 -0600; While the RTTY weenies running high power make one contact per minute this Saturday I will be nosing around "their" frequencies, making two contacts per minute in the NAQP CW with my receiver passban; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00068.html (7,501 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP vs ARRL RTTY Roundup (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:19:21 -0700; I'll see you there Jim, with my passband narrowed up, and a short exchange... the interference won't be able to keep up. We can be done and move to a new freq by the time they get to tx. --... ...--; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00074.html (8,545 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]