Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NS\s+Ladder\,\s+Dupes\s+vs\.\s+No\s+Dupes\s+Test\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NS\s+Ladder\,\s+Dupes\s+vs\.\s+No\s+Dupes\s+Test\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] NS Ladder, Dupes vs. No Dupes Test (score: 1): Author: "Bill Haddon" <haddon.bill@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:12:31 -0700; As the NS Ladder went through it's fifth year, there was a thread of comments to the effect that our liberal policy of duplicate contacts might be hurting the smaller stations disproportionately. So; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00238.html (7,896 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] NS Ladder, Dupes vs. No Dupes Test (score: 1): Author: <sabrams@nycap.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:45:25 -0400; I cannot dispute the statistical analysis, but numbers don't always tell the whole story. This is my NY "take" just from my experience during the last two months or so--I'm a newbie at this and don't; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00241.html (8,571 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]