Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Narrow\s+CW\s+filters\s+and\s+RTTY\s+contesting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Narrow\s+CW\s+filters\s+and\s+RTTY\s+contesting\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Narrow CW filters and RTTY contesting (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:45:30 -0700 (PDT); Is the Yaesu/INRAD 300hz mechanical CW filter still wide enough to use with RTTY operations and contesting, or would the 500hz filter work better? 73s John AA5JG _____________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00149.html (6,795 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Narrow CW filters and RTTY contesting (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:06:40 -0500; Yes, a 300 Hz filter will work just fine on RTTY, especially during the crowded conditions during CQWW and ARRL Roundup contests. Theoretically you can narrow down to 265 Hz before you begin to degra; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00153.html (8,562 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]