New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log Changes Posted on Radio-sport.net Along with instituting a new five day log submission deadline, the CQ WW Contest Committee has included a specific rule chang
Hello all, that means eQSL and LotW should be shut down 9 days after CQ WW Contest 73s, Zik DK8ZZ, VE3ZIK, YT3ZZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@con
You can't tell someone else how to run their business. You make a rule in the contest that logs should not be uploaded to any databases, except the contest robot, until the log submission period is o
That would be a stupid rule. It's not my responsibility to keep my log secret so others can't cheat. My logs are uploaded to the robot, eQSL, LoTW, Hamlog.eu, QRZ.com, and Club Log within minutes of
Hello Barry, it's all ok, but tell me who will control if the log is uploaded on LotW/eQSL or not :-)? 73s, Zik DK8ZZ, VE3ZIK, YT3ZZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
N1MM Logger has several "features" that could be misused for post-contest log scrubbing. As a member of the development team, I made a change a few years ago to not allow those features to be used un
Of course you cannot control the actions of anyone not submitting a log to the contest, but if it is a contest rule that logs are not to be uploaded until after the submission deadline, a violation i
W2UP's presumption is incorrect. This rule states that no one should use the information from those or any other databases to make changes to the contest log after the contest has ended. It goes no f
Folks, I have been following this thread with amusement for some time now. I have come to realize that these debates, to the best of my recollection, have been around since I first subscribe in the e
The modification refers to rule XII(2), which reads: "2. All sent and received exchanges are to be logged. In addition to the number exchange, the call sign sent by an entrant during a completed exch
Hello ALL, Because I can not believe I will be not able to use my own audio recordings after the contest (what I am doing very rare and just for the really questionable moments which are very few) I
I don't see any language which requires a call sign to be sent, BUT you are required to enter WHAT IS SENT, so I assume that means that an <null> entry must be transcribed in your log. 73, de Hans, K
It means that if you accidentally sent (using for instance, a hand keyer) "DL76A" instead of DL7BA, then it should be logged as "DL76A" in your LOG. 73 Yuri FP/VE3DZ _________________________________
I would disagree that grooming your log /post contest/ with an audio recording is acceptable. I believe that my log ought to reflect what I actually recorded IN THE HEAT OF BATTLE. No exceptions. 73,
This brings up a few interesting points. In the June VHF contest this year I worked a bunch of stations that identified on CW as "K9ABC/R" or "K9ABC Rover" on SSB. How are you supposed to log this as
I would agree with Hans, but would add that the 'log' isn't just what you type into the computer. I would argue that if you write out a note during the contest correcting an entry, that note becomes
Thought it said database, recordings or confirming QSOs. If so, make all the notes you want and fix post contest. Should not be an issue Stan, K5GO Sent from Stan's IPhone ___________________________
Agreed, Kelly. I'd consider a correction note scribbled in the midst of the contest as perfectly within both the letter and spirit of the competition (unless that note was "check my audio recording o
I've never been in favor of super-strict interpretation of the rules, but I think one can make a legitimate argument that *any* editing of the log after the contest constitutes operating outside the
How would you view editing them coming back from a break, but before you started calling CQ again? 73, Guy. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesti