Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+New\s+Contesting\s+Classification\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: <scottmcleman36@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 17:37:36 +0100
Some love them some hate them! But what the hell does it matter ? As long as the remote operator is staying within the rules and correctly identifying the transmitter location. Coming from experience
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00025.html (8,306 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 15:03:47 -0500
Exactly! I don't know why it is so hard for some people to grasp this. If the path between the transmitters/receivers of both stations is via the aether, ionosphere, free space or whatever you want t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00030.html (23,642 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 22:08:29 +0100
Exactly! I don't know why it is so hard for some people to grasp this. If the path between the transmitters/receivers of both stations is via the aether, ionosphere, free space or whatever you want
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00033.html (9,094 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 18:16:44 -0700
Hi Paul, You just broke your argument. "Conversations take place between people. Telephone calls take place between people. QSOs take place between people." Exactly. A telephone call is a conversatio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00037.html (8,769 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 21:38:02 -0500
I have been trying to say that these "irrefutable facts" are indeed refutable. I know of quite a few instances where a station was controlled remotely by other means than internet. Some of them are,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00039.html (10,732 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 20:28:50 -0700
1. Non-remote operators are at all times communicating over wires. 2. Without wires, there would be no communications whatsoever with other operators. What exactly is your point, Paul? Ed W0YK ______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00040.html (9,905 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 03:54:14 +0000
You know, for one of my radios, there is a piece of CAT6 cable that connects the control unit (into which I plug paddles, headphones, and on rare occasions a mic) with the main body of the transceive
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00042.html (9,694 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:09:09 +0300
Also I am missing something. The radio2radio QSO is. Adding some more wire or anything fabricated between the operator and poewr amplifier output is just an add-on that adds to complexity and subtrac
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00045.html (12,175 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:57:30 +0100
<snip> I have, between my lips and my transmitter, I have a bunch of relays, capacitors and a transformer or two. And there is a computer, it's whole infrastructure whatever there is .. I had a compu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00048.html (10,373 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 07:52:38 -0500
Apparently there are people who think that something like: Operator > control > radio > antenna > repeater > *internet* > repeater > antenna > control > operator is the same thing as Operator > contr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00049.html (14,378 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:44:56 +0300
Hi Paul, Comments below -- 500m radius is for the radio station transmitters and receivers. The antennas must be physically connected to the radio. The wording allows remote operation. The rule is ac
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00052.html (12,877 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:51:27 +0300
Zack et al .. Let's see what needs defining .. This is a typical VUHF repeater setup for a repeater QSO. Right? There are such equipment on at least also 10m band. Using those repeaters is not accord
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00054.html (16,685 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification (score: 1)
Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 15:13:43 +0000
Actually, I think the difference of opinion boils down to two pieces: Ignoring those contests/events where part of "the object" is for someone to physically go to someplace interesting and operate a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00055.html (14,026 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu