Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+New\s+Rules\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+New\s+Rules\!\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] New Rules! (score: 1): Author: "Bob Gates" <regates@kingwoodcable.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 17:29:14 -0500; Now that the dust has finally settled on two rather contentious contesting issues, it's time to get serious and institute some new rules that would apply to all contests. These new rules are way past; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00407.html (11,666 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Rules! (score: 1): Author: Sean Fleming <sean@k8khz.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 17:48:59 -0700 (PDT); I guess I am disqualified. I always use my french, canadian, British, russian, German, Bulgarian, ZL, and VK accents. Don't forget to send your callsign numbers in the other countries language. such; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00408.html (12,757 bytes)
3. Fw: [CQ-Contest] New Rules! (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 02:44:18 -0000; Quack additions: I think there should also be a pentalty for Mobiles operating in FQP from using inferor antenna to keep the Left coast from hearing them. and then When we call them not coming back a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00409.html (13,577 bytes)
4. RE: [CQ-Contest] New Rules! (score: 1): Author: "Hanlon, Steve" <SHanlon@dnr.state.md.us>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 07:41:14 -0400; you missed April 1st by a few weeks. please tell me this was meant to be an April Fool's email that got delayed... what if i'm of Irish origin and now live in the States... do i add a bunch of Ameri; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00412.html (8,553 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Rules! (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 07:20:58 -0700; _________________________________________________________ That was perhaps the funniest line in the whole post. Nothing has ever been settled when it comes to contentious contesting issues. :-) -- Bi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00415.html (8,565 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Rules! (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:00:54 +0100; contesting "The dust will not settle in our time. And when it does some great roaring machine will come and whirl it all sky-high again." --Samuel Beckett -- The world's top contesters battle it out; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00416.html (8,837 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Rules! (score: 1): Author: "MikeR" <nf4l@nf4l.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:54:41 -0400; Outstanding suggestions! Seems like they should have been posted 24 days ago, but the imperative to join Procrastinators Now must have overridden the priority. 73 Mike NF4L -- Original Message -- Fro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00422.html (13,570 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Rules! (score: 1): Author: "Bob Gates" <regates@kingwoodcable.com>; Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 18:56:47 -0500; Sorry everyone, but have been a bit under the weather for a while, and e-mail has been on the bottom of my priority list. But there were several replies to my original proposals, and some clarificati; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00134.html (14,954 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]