Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+New\s+log\s+deadline\s+for\s+ARRL\s+contests\?\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: kl7y@alaska.net (Dan Robbins)
Date: Fri Jun 7 06:01:09 2002
Single ops seem to have no problem with sending logs in right away, but some of our multi-op efforts resulted in logs that were totally screwed up. At one point we had a lot of RF getting into the co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00088.html (10,588 bytes)

22. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker)
Date: Fri Jun 7 08:57:27 2002
To answer the question posed about how hard is to log contacts on the wrong band given that in 2002 everyone has computer control of the rigs... It is very easy to log contacts on the wrong band in a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00092.html (10,084 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson)
Date: Fri Jun 7 11:32:41 2002
I agree with Randy. The biggest problem with log checking is getting everyone to submit a proper log. When you receive logs in say a non cabrillo format the log must be run through a converter and wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00094.html (10,580 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: jds@twistedoak.com (Jeff Stai)
Date: Fri Jun 7 09:18:10 2002
1. The connection between computer and rig fails (bad or loose connection) and you don't notice right away. 2. Until recently, my K2 did not have a serial port, so it was an issue. 73 - jeff wk6i Jef
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00096.html (9,690 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Fri Jun 7 17:13:39 2002
I agree with Randy & several others that the shortening the deadline, at this time, does not appear to make sense. Now, I'm all for getting contest results back in hand faster, but I think a combinat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00097.html (11,563 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM)
Date: Thu Jun 6 01:06:48 2002
Why not finish a contest, immediately produce the required file, and then immediately e-mail it and be done. for days is up, send human
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00312.html (11,084 bytes)

27. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM)
Date: Fri Jun 7 01:54:49 2002
Just want to see the process speeded up. I just did learn that some logging program actually puts comments in the log ? WOW ! Glad I don't use that one. ensuing list" - plenty
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00315.html (10,809 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] New log deadline for ARRL contests? (score: 1)
Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM)
Date: Fri Jun 7 05:31:26 2002
Wondered how many band problems existed anyway with logging programs reading the rigs frequency ....in 2002. the I submitting in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00316.html (11,604 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu